Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change positional args manifest and key to optional args #118

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

svenkata9
Copy link

@svenkata9 svenkata9 commented Jan 5, 2023

Signed-off-by: Sankaranarayanan Venkatasubramanian sankaranarayanan.venkatasubramanian@intel.com

Description of the changes

This PR changes the positional arguments manifest and key that gsc build and gsc sign-image commands take respectively to optional ones. This change is being done separately now to accommodate change for production signing #112 (to avoid introducing the breaking change for key as optional argument)

How to test this PR?

docker pull python
./gsc build -L --manifest test/generic.manifest python
./gsc sign-image -k enclave-key.pem python

and run the resulting gsc-python image.


This change is Reviewable

Signed-off-by: Sankaranarayanan Venkatasubramanian <sankaranarayanan.venkatasubramanian@intel.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@dimakuv dimakuv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 6 unresolved discussions, not enough approvals from maintainers (3 more required), not enough approvals from different teams (2 more required, approved so far: ) (waiting on @svenkata9)


-- commits line 2 at r1:
Can we shorten this title by replacing arguments -> args (2x)


-- commits line 2 at r1:
I think Change sounds better than Update


gsc.py line 229 at r1 (raw file):

        user_manifest_contents = user_manifest_file.read()

    user_manifest_dict = tomli.loads(user_manifest_contents)

If I understand correctly, if user skips --manifest ..., then ./gsc build will fail here.

Instead, we should allow to omit --manifest, in this case user_manifest_dict should be assigned to empty dict. So I think we need something like this:

    if args.manifest:
        user_manifest_contents = ''
        if not os.path.exists(args.manifest):
            raise FileNotFoundError(f'Manifest file {args.manifest} does not exist')
        with open(args.manifest, 'r') as user_manifest_file:
            user_manifest_contents = user_manifest_file.read()
        user_manifest_dict = tomli.loads(user_manifest_contents)
    else:
        user_manifest_dict = {} # no user-provided manifest

Please test GSC when --manifest is used and when it is omitted.


gsc.py line 363 at r1 (raw file):

    tmp_build_key_path = tmp_build_path / 'gsc-signer-key.pem'
    tmp_build_sign_path = tmp_build_path / 'sign.sh'
    shutil.copyfile(os.path.abspath(args.key), tmp_build_key_path)

What happens if user didn't specify --key some.key? Will GSC fail with some complicated error at this line?

Can we add a check here that if not args.key or not os.path.exists(args.key): print("some error"); sys.exit(1)?


gsc.py line 503 at r1 (raw file):

sub_sign.add_argument('-c', '--config_file', type=argparse.FileType('r', encoding='UTF-8'),
    default='config.yaml', help='Specify configuration file.')
sub_sign.add_argument('image', help='Name of the application (base) Docker image.')

Can we also move this argument after all args (i.e., after -p)? So that it's easy to see that this is the positional mandatory arg.


Documentation/index.rst line 150 at r1 (raw file):

.. option:: -k

   Used to sign the Intel SGX enclave

I would expand to Key file used to sign the Intel SGX enclave

@svenkata9 svenkata9 changed the title Update positional arguments manifest and key to optional arguments Change positional args manifest and key to optional args Jan 5, 2023
Copy link
Author

@svenkata9 svenkata9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 2 of 4 files reviewed, 6 unresolved discussions, not enough approvals from maintainers (3 more required), not enough approvals from different teams (2 more required, approved so far: ), "fixup! " found in commit messages' one-liners (waiting on @dimakuv)


-- commits line 2 at r1:

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

Can we shorten this title by replacing arguments -> args (2x)

Done


-- commits line 2 at r1:

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

I think Change sounds better than Update

Done


gsc.py line 229 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

If I understand correctly, if user skips --manifest ..., then ./gsc build will fail here.

Instead, we should allow to omit --manifest, in this case user_manifest_dict should be assigned to empty dict. So I think we need something like this:

    if args.manifest:
        user_manifest_contents = ''
        if not os.path.exists(args.manifest):
            raise FileNotFoundError(f'Manifest file {args.manifest} does not exist')
        with open(args.manifest, 'r') as user_manifest_file:
            user_manifest_contents = user_manifest_file.read()
        user_manifest_dict = tomli.loads(user_manifest_contents)
    else:
        user_manifest_dict = {} # no user-provided manifest

Please test GSC when --manifest is used and when it is omitted.

Done.


gsc.py line 363 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

What happens if user didn't specify --key some.key? Will GSC fail with some complicated error at this line?

Can we add a check here that if not args.key or not os.path.exists(args.key): print("some error"); sys.exit(1)?

Done.


gsc.py line 503 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

Can we also move this argument after all args (i.e., after -p)? So that it's easy to see that this is the positional mandatory arg.

Done.


Documentation/index.rst line 150 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

I would expand to Key file used to sign the Intel SGX enclave

Done.

Copy link
Contributor

@dimakuv dimakuv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions, not enough approvals from maintainers (2 more required), not enough approvals from different teams (1 more required, approved so far: Intel), "fixup! " found in commit messages' one-liners

@svenkata9
Copy link
Author

@woju @mkow Could you review? This is a breaking change, but needed one - without which we aren't able to do production signing. So, we are making all arguments except IMAGE as optional.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants