New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add JSON dependency to core #1291
Conversation
If JTS is able to read and write geojson on its own we probably don't need to add jackson to the core. |
I should note that JTS also broke itself into a few modules, so jts-core is the main replacement, and then there's also jts-io-common. They use json-simple under the hood. |
Thanks for highlighting this! I think we will then better stay with jackson instead of using the inactive json-simple. (conveyal/gtfs-lib#97 (comment)) |
Really hard decision, but I think for now we close this and try to keep JSON out of the core. Still unsure. |
As discussed here introducing the JSON dependency in core could make several things less clunky, especially since it seems we need this in #1112 in the core as we use the json format instead of the hacky binary+text mix of StorableProperties. (It will not happen for 0.10)