Are there plans for a Reactive implementation #152
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
Hello, Hum, not yet. I'm working on the 2.x version, to use the spring-graphql dependency. Once this is done, I guess that it would be a good target. But I must first check what would be the impact (on both the plug-in itself, and the code of the application that would use the code) Étienne |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, The 2.x version is based on webflux, so it should use the reactive implementation. But, when checking before answering your question, I discovered this: if you're using subscription, then you have to add the And there is an issue in the doc about the mvc being used. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The Reactive implementation is now commited. It will be available in the next release, coming soon. The implementation now generates:
Etienne |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi all,
We're currently using the latest version in Micronaut but the generated code signatures requires us to block on the remote call. Have you considered adding a reactive programming approach that returns Mono/Flux objects?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions