Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Object type string and repr method #295

Closed

Conversation

Globegitter
Copy link
Contributor

Seems to me a nice thing to have. The main question though is, would we also want to show empty fields or any information about the resolvers? (Conceptually I see an ObjectType not just as an object that has data but an object that has data as well as knowledge on how to fetch data)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 91.201% when pulling a7e90a3 on Globegitter:object-type-string-method into f955280 on graphql-python:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 91.201% when pulling a7e90a3 on Globegitter:object-type-string-method into f955280 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 91.201% when pulling a7e90a3 on Globegitter:object-type-string-method into f955280 on graphql-python:master.

@Globegitter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why pypy is failing with:

ImportError while importing test module '/home/travis/build/graphql-python/graphene/graphene/types/tests/test_objecttype.py'.
Original error message:
'No module named mock'
Make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.

Any ideas?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 29, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jul 29, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this Aug 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants