historic=monument, tourism=information should display a monument icon

[matkoniecz]

see for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4042168387#map=19/49.54256/20.11262

[polarbearing]

Is that really a monument in the OSM meaning? How does it look like on the ground?

Similarly this wayside cross nearby might deserve a different tag?

[matkoniecz]

@polarbearing I replied on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37632715 (as this problem exists even if this case is a tagging error).

[polarbearing]

Thanks, I have found the CS discussion and commented there.

I think that the combination historic=monument + tourism=information is rather unusual when tagged correctly. The monument should be monumental enough to be mapped as a polygon, and the information insignificant in relation so it would be a node inside/nearby.

[dieterdreist]

sent from a phone

Am 11.03.2016 um 11:04 schrieb polarbearing notifications@github.com:

I think that the combination historic=monument + tourism=information is rather unusual when tagged correctly.

this is generally common: mixing of different features into one object (e.g. buildings and functions in the buildings, also barriers like fences and the area they encircle).

[Tomasz-W]

There are only 25 nodes with this problem on whole map. Part of them are just bad tagged historic=memorial or man_made=obelisk, and part of them means a memorial plaque on a monument, which is actually its inregrated part, and tagging it as tourism=information + information=board is also a mistake. I'll try to repair these bad tagged nodes.

Please close this ticket.