Allow UpdateDataDocsAction to also specify data doc sites to build

[troxil]

Rationale

• DataContext -> build_data_docs can support a list of certain sites you want docs written to. This PR enables the same from within the UpdateDataDocsAction.

Changes

• By supplying a new config target_site_names which would be a list (I didn't see any typing used so I didn't add in a type check List[str].

Sample great_expectations.yml:

validation_operators:
  action_list_operator:
    class_name: ActionListValidationOperator
    action_list:
    - name: update_fun_data_docs
      action:
        class_name: UpdateDataDocsAction
        target_site_names:
          - fun_site

[gx-cla-bot]

A new contributor, HUZZAH! Welcome and thanks for joining our community. In order to accept a pull request we require that all contributors sign our Contributor License Agreement. We have two different CLAs, depending on whether you are contributing to GE in a personal or professional capacity. Please sign the one that is applicable to your situation so that we may accept your contribution:

Individual Contributor License Agreement v1.0
Software Grant and Corporate Contributor License Agreement v1.0

Once you have signed the CLA, you can add a comment with the text @cla-bot check and the bot will update the PR status!

Please reach out to @kyleaton, on our Slack if you have any questions or if you have already signed the CLA and are receiving this message in error.

Users missing a CLA: troxil

[troxil]

@cla-bot check

[gx-cla-bot]

A new contributor, HUZZAH! Welcome and thanks for joining our community. In order to accept a pull request we require that all contributors sign our Contributor License Agreement. We have two different CLAs, depending on whether you are contributing to GE in a personal or professional capacity. Please sign the one that is applicable to your situation so that we may accept your contribution:

Individual Contributor License Agreement v1.0
Software Grant and Corporate Contributor License Agreement v1.0

Once you have signed the CLA, you can add a comment with the text @cla-bot check and the bot will update the PR status!

Please reach out to @kyleaton, on our Slack if you have any questions or if you have already signed the CLA and are receiving this message in error.

Users missing a CLA: troxil

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 77.762% when pulling 1cc9cd7 on troxil:data_docs_write_select_sites into 996e33f on great-expectations:develop.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 77.72% when pulling 5ae9cb7 on troxil:data_docs_write_select_sites into e37a033 on great-expectations:develop.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1256 into develop will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1256   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    77.76%   77.76%           
========================================
  Files          107      107           
  Lines        12334    12335    +1     
========================================
+ Hits          9591     9592    +1     
  Misses        2743     2743           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
great_expectations/validation_operators/actions.py	81.05% <100.00%> (+0.20%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 996e33f...1cc9cd7. Read the comment docs.

[jcampbell]

Thank you!

Could you please add a note to the changelog and docstring for the action?

Also -- let me know about any questions/issues with the CLA!

[troxil]

@cla-bot check

[pep8speaks]

Thank you for submitting to Great Expectations!

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 This linter comment has been updated based on the most recent commit.

Comment last updated at 2020-04-07 12:28:49 UTC

[jcampbell]

Thank you!