Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MAINTENANCE] Clean up Checkpoint test method names and usage of batch_request_dict fixture #7670

Conversation

alexsherstinsky
Copy link
Contributor

@alexsherstinsky alexsherstinsky commented Apr 20, 2023

Scope

  • Current version had typographical errors in Checkpoint test method names; these are being corrected.
  • Current version had unnecessary inclusion of batch_request_dict fixture as part of arguments in several Checkpoint test methods; these are being removed.

Remarks

Please annotate your PR title to describe what the PR does, then give a brief bulleted description of your PR below. PR titles should begin with [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], or [CONTRIB]. If a new feature introduces breaking changes for the Great Expectations API or configuration files, please also add [BREAKING]. You can read about the tags in our contributor checklist.

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • JIRA: DX-469/DX-470

After submitting your PR, CI checks will run and @cla-bot will check for your CLA signature.

For a PR with nontrivial changes, we review with both design-centric and code-centric lenses.

In a design review, we aim to ensure that the PR is consistent with our relationship to the open source community, with our software architecture and abstractions, and with our users' needs and expectations. That review often starts well before a PR, for example in GitHub issues or Slack, so please link to relevant conversations in notes below to help reviewers understand and approve your PR more quickly (e.g. closes #123).

Previous Design Review notes:

Definition of Done

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • My code follows the Great Expectations style guide
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added unit tests where applicable and made sure that new and existing tests are passing.
  • I have run any local integration tests and made sure that nothing is broken.

Thank you for submitting!

Alex Sherstinsky and others added 8 commits April 20, 2023 09:18
…/link/assess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_19-4
…ess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_19-4
…heckpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_19-4' into maintenance/DX-469/DX-470/alexsherstinsky/link/assess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_20-5
…sherstinsky/link/assess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_19-4' into maintenance/DX-469/DX-470/alexsherstinsky/link/assess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_20-5
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 20, 2023

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4f59fc5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/6441c20403b7200008f3f7d1

@alexsherstinsky alexsherstinsky requested review from a team April 20, 2023 19:12
@alexsherstinsky alexsherstinsky marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2023 19:23
@alexsherstinsky alexsherstinsky enabled auto-merge (squash) April 20, 2023 19:23
…ess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_20-5
Copy link
Contributor

@Shinnnyshinshin Shinnnyshinshin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

…ess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_20-5
…ess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_20-5
@alexsherstinsky alexsherstinsky merged commit d75d4fe into develop Apr 20, 2023
@alexsherstinsky alexsherstinsky deleted the maintenance/DX-469/DX-470/alexsherstinsky/link/assess_checkpoint_operation_with_fluent_datasource_batch_request-2023_04_20-5 branch April 20, 2023 23:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants