Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CONTRIB] fixing null eq safe for SQLAlchemy and rendering #8617

Conversation

karthigaiselvanm
Copy link
Contributor

@karthigaiselvanm karthigaiselvanm commented Aug 25, 2023

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses black + ruff)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, see Contribute.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 25, 2023

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 009d046
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/64f2736142ede40008a70fa3

@karthigaiselvanm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @kenwade4 the checks are failing at cloud-tests with error "E great_expectations.exceptions.exceptions.DataContextError: "GX_CLOUD_ORGANIZATION_ID", "GX_CLOUD_ACCESS_TOKEN" arg(s) required for ge_cloud_mode but neither provided nor found in environment or in global configs ("/home/runner/.great_expectations/great_expectations.conf", "/etc/great_expectations.conf")."

@Shinnnyshinshin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @karthigaiselvanm sorry about the delay on this one. I'm picking up the task from Ken.

  1. the most recent merge from /develop should address the errors you were seeing before
  2. I'll have a look at the proposed changes to the Expectation as well.

Comment on lines +68 to +70
column_list[idx] != column_list[0],
sa.and_(column_list[idx].is_(None), column_list[0].isnot(None)),
sa.and_(column_list[idx].isnot(None), column_list[0].is_(None)),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@Shinnnyshinshin Shinnnyshinshin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @karthigaiselvanm thank you very much for this. Rendering and the null case both look great

@Shinnnyshinshin Shinnnyshinshin merged commit b0290e2 into great-expectations:develop Sep 2, 2023
48 of 49 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants