Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MAINTENANCE] Rename ge_cloud_id to id #9529

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Feb 26, 2024
Merged

[MAINTENANCE] Rename ge_cloud_id to id #9529

merged 11 commits into from Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

cdkini
Copy link
Member

@cdkini cdkini commented Feb 26, 2024

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses black + ruff)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, see Contribute.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 26, 2024

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0cb2ef8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/65dcb359de083900083a1a7e

Comment on lines +216 to +218
# Temporary fork to account for pre-V1 configs
if "ge_cloud_id" in suite_kwargs and "id" not in suite_kwargs:
suite_kwargs["id"] = suite_kwargs.pop("ge_cloud_id")
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added this to get E2E tests passing - should we just xfail instead?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the e3e test interacting with cloud or with file-based context? if cloud, I'd say what you have here is good, and we should just create a small ticket to track cleaning this up.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think this is worth it to maintain test coverage

Copy link
Member

@joshua-stauffer joshua-stauffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 looks good, thanks!

@cdkini cdkini added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 6b431a5 Feb 26, 2024
67 checks passed
@cdkini cdkini deleted the m/_/rename_ge_cloud_id branch February 26, 2024 16:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants