Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MAINTENANCE] Actually remove LegacyDatasource #9867

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

tyler-hoffman
Copy link
Contributor

Oops! #9848 only deleted references to LegacyDatasource. This actually gets rid of the class.

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, see Contribute.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 2, 2024

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 02db132
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/663392f7fd9dbf000816ea52

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.39%. Comparing base (afadd61) to head (02db132).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #9867      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    81.21%   81.39%   +0.17%     
===========================================
  Files          502      501       -1     
  Lines        44687    44590      -97     
===========================================
- Hits         36294    36293       -1     
+ Misses        8393     8297      -96     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 65.82% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️
3.10 athena or clickhouse or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.10 aws_deps ?
3.10 big ?
3.10 databricks ?
3.10 filesystem ?
3.10 mssql ?
3.10 mysql ?
3.10 postgresql ?
3.10 snowflake ?
3.10 spark ?
3.10 trino ?
3.11 65.82% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️
3.11 athena or clickhouse or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 53.60% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
3.11 aws_deps 44.38% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️
3.11 big 59.63% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️
3.11 databricks 45.47% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️
3.11 filesystem 62.39% <ø> (+0.13%) ⬆️
3.11 mssql 48.22% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
3.11 mysql 48.27% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
3.11 postgresql 51.94% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
3.11 snowflake 46.07% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
3.11 spark 58.22% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️
3.11 trino 51.25% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
3.8 65.84% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️
3.8 athena or clickhouse or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 53.61% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
3.8 aws_deps 44.40% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️
3.8 big 59.63% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️
3.8 databricks 45.48% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️
3.8 filesystem 62.40% <ø> (+0.13%) ⬆️
3.8 mssql 48.20% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
3.8 mysql 48.26% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
3.8 postgresql 51.93% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
3.8 snowflake 46.09% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
3.8 spark 58.18% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️
3.8 trino 51.24% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
3.9 65.83% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️
3.9 athena or clickhouse or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.9 aws_deps ?
3.9 big ?
3.9 databricks ?
3.9 filesystem ?
3.9 mssql ?
3.9 mysql ?
3.9 postgresql ?
3.9 snowflake ?
3.9 spark ?
3.9 trino ?
cloud 0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic 52.30% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
docs-creds-needed 53.40% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
docs-spark 52.06% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@joshua-stauffer joshua-stauffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😬

@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman added this pull request to the merge queue May 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit e08b025 May 2, 2024
68 checks passed
@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman deleted the m/v1-33/actually-delete-legacy-datasource branch May 2, 2024 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants