[MAINTENANCE] Remove references to suite crud

[tyler-hoffman]

Most of this was handled in #9890. This is just a tiny bit of cleanup (that I'm surprised didn't need to be done as part of that PR)

• Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
• PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB]
• Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
• Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, see Contribute.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d1da04a
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/663cd6530b5d5400087eec73

[tyler-hoffman]

Not sure what's up here; this happened just because of the below change.

[tyler-hoffman]

Looks like I had ported this test over, but the intention of the test was to test context CRUD methods, so removing it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.27%. Comparing base (77fc8e9) to head (d1da04a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #9907   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    77.27%   77.27%           
========================================
  Files          492      492           
  Lines        41999    41999           
========================================
  Hits         32455    32455           
  Misses        9544     9544           

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.10	63.72% <ø> (ø)
3.11	63.72% <ø> (ø)
3.11 athena or clickhouse or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds	53.63% <ø> (ø)
3.11 aws_deps	44.76% <ø> (ø)
3.11 big	54.22% <ø> (ø)
3.11 databricks	45.90% <ø> (ø)
3.11 filesystem	59.17% <ø> (ø)
3.11 mssql	48.74% <ø> (ø)
3.11 mysql	48.80% <ø> (ø)
3.11 postgresql	52.67% <ø> (ø)
3.11 snowflake	46.54% <ø> (ø)
3.11 spark	56.30% <ø> (ø)
3.11 trino	50.73% <ø> (ø)
3.8	63.74% <ø> (ø)
3.8 athena or clickhouse or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds	53.64% <ø> (ø)
3.8 aws_deps	44.78% <ø> (ø)
3.8 big	54.23% <ø> (ø)
3.8 databricks	45.92% <ø> (ø)
3.8 filesystem	59.18% <ø> (ø)
3.8 mssql	48.72% <ø> (ø)
3.8 mysql	48.78% <ø> (ø)
3.8 postgresql	52.65% <ø> (ø)
3.8 snowflake	46.55% <ø> (ø)
3.8 spark	56.26% <ø> (ø)
3.8 trino	50.71% <ø> (ø)
3.9	63.73% <ø> (ø)
cloud	0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic	47.37% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed	48.42% <ø> (ø)
docs-spark	47.09% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cdkini]

Do we need these examples?