Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change: extend cert_query() nasl function to get the public key algorithm (backport #995) #998

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2021

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Dec 9, 2021

This is an automatic backport of pull request #995 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

…ithm (#995)

Also, the old option "algorithm-name" is replaced with "signature-algorithm-name"
The new cert information public-key-algorithm-name is required. It was confused with the signature algorithm.

Test with
`openvas-nasl -X -B -d -t google.com -i $VTDIR gb_tls_version_get.nasl gb_ssl_tls_cert_details.nasl --kb="TCP/PORTS=443"`

And you should see now in the output both, the signature algorithm and the new the public key algorithm.

(cherry picked from commit 9b1925b)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2021 09:19
@jjnicola jjnicola enabled auto-merge (squash) December 9, 2021 09:23
@jjnicola jjnicola merged commit 9eb023b into stable Dec 9, 2021
@jjnicola jjnicola deleted the mergify/bp/stable/pr-995 branch December 9, 2021 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants