Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

R4: which conferences are included is poorly justified #60

Closed
cgreene opened this issue Mar 14, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #92
Closed

R4: which conferences are included is poorly justified #60

cgreene opened this issue Mar 14, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #92

Comments

@cgreene
Copy link
Member

cgreene commented Mar 14, 2020

  • The analysis focuses on ISCB, its fellows and its conferences. ISCB conferences are listed at: https://www.iscb.org/iscb-conferences however, justification was not provided as to why some conferences made it and others did not. PSB for example was assessed as international but this is hard to justify given its location patterns. GIW/ISCB-Asia is omitted, but no justification was given. This is of course of significant importance for the conclusions. Either justification or expanded analysis is needed.
@cgreene cgreene mentioned this issue Mar 14, 2020
Closed
@trangdata
Copy link
Collaborator

relates to #62

@trangdata trangdata mentioned this issue Mar 20, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add responses to reviewers greenelab/iscb-diversity-manuscript
2 participants
@cgreene @trangdata