Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(6x) gpexpand.status_detail should be distributed by "table_oid". #14769

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 19, 2023

Conversation

kainwen
Copy link
Contributor

@kainwen kainwen commented Jan 12, 2023

The table gpexpand.status_detail used by gpexpand should be distributed by "table_oid",
to avoid the updating workload burden of tens thounsand tables in a segment, concentrated
on only one single segment with the prior distribution policy (distributed by dbname).

Authored-by: Peng Han phan@vmware.com

The table gpexpand.status_detail used by gpexpand should be
distributed by "table_oid", to avoid the updating workload burden of
tens thounsand tables in a segment, concentrated on only one single
segment with the prior distribution policy (distributed by dbname).

Authored-by: Peng Han <phan@vmware.com>
@kainwen
Copy link
Contributor Author

kainwen commented Jan 12, 2023

@kainwen kainwen merged commit cbcb15b into greenplum-db:6X_STABLE Jan 19, 2023
@kainwen kainwen deleted the 6x_expand_refine_details branch January 19, 2023 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants