New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
five-note neume does not display #284
Comments
If you need a short-term work around, use ghg/fg. |
Team, should I target |
actually liquescent. Fixes gregorio-project#284. (grafted from ac1f7ee02d7909944af493c5794dbd70fb7b53a1)
actually liquescent. Fixes gregorio-project#284.
actually liquescent. Fixes gregorio-project#284.
I decided to just target both. If we decide not to include in |
If it passes all the tests, then it would be good for |
Yes, it passes all the tests I expect it to pass. There are some tests which are known different in |
I'd be in favor of both |
Corrected to use "torculus liquescens" only if the last note is actually liquescent. Fixes #284.
Corrected to use "torculus liquescens" only if the last note is actually liquescent. Fixes #284.
If there are five notes in a row, with no specification of neume type, the first four notes do not appear in the output, and only the last note is displayed. If I add a separator ("!" or "/") to the input, the neume is formed correctly.
Here is a minimal example:
%%
(c4)A(g!hgfg) (::)
a(ghgfg) (::)
When I process this, the first series of notes appears in full; but the second group of notes doesn't: only the last note of the series appears.
I found this behavior in v.3.0.0-rc1 (on Linux, with TeXLive2013). Another user confirms it with v.3.0.0-rc2 on Mac.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: