Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vertical and horizontal episem crossing #395

Closed
jperon opened this issue May 9, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

vertical and horizontal episem crossing #395

jperon opened this issue May 9, 2015 · 8 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jperon
Copy link
Contributor

jperon commented May 9, 2015

This figure is quite frequent :

Test.(ghg'_)

Here is the output we get : the vertical episem should be placed lower to avoid "collision".

mwe

@eroux eroux added this to the 4.0 milestone May 11, 2015
@eroux
Copy link
Contributor

eroux commented May 11, 2015

In the original file, are the two episemus at the bottom or is one at the top?

@jperon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jperon commented May 11, 2015

You're right, my mistake : the horizontal episem should be above.
Here is an even more interresting case : it should be possible to have an episem over the note, bridged with the following one ; it's not possible, neither with ghf'_/g_f'fe. (that gives the result below), nor with ghf'/g__f'fe. (that gives an episem only on the note after the neumatic cut).

mwe

@jperon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jperon commented May 11, 2015

N.B : in all such cases, the horizontal episem is quite high, as if it where above the higher note of the torculus.

@eroux
Copy link
Contributor

eroux commented May 11, 2015

So I believe it's a combination of #389 + #40 (not the original issue, but what it turned out to be in the comments). @henryso if you agree, you can mark as duplicate. @jperon it should be fixed in 4.0

@jperon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jperon commented May 11, 2015

Should it be fixed in develop or in future 4.0 ? I'm testing on develop now.

@jakubjelinek
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds like https://gna.org/bugs/?22639

@eroux
Copy link
Contributor

eroux commented May 11, 2015

It's not fixed yet, but the fix is planned for 4.0. @jakubjelinek yes, this is a variant of the bug

@eroux
Copy link
Contributor

eroux commented May 11, 2015

Thinking back about it, I think it might be useful to have both below (it's certainly a bit more readable in some cases), and Gregorio should handle that too... So keeping this open. But it can be for a release after 4.0, no emergency.

@jperon jperon modified the milestones: 3.0, 4.0 May 11, 2015
@henryso henryso self-assigned this May 11, 2015
henryso added a commit to henryso/gregorio that referenced this issue May 12, 2015
It now takes into account the entire syllable and vertical episemae when
positioning the horizontal episemae.
Fixes gregorio-project#389 and gregorio-project#395.
henryso added a commit to henryso/gregorio that referenced this issue May 12, 2015
It now takes into account the entire syllable and vertical episemae when
positioning the horizontal episemae.
Fixes gregorio-project#389 and gregorio-project#395.
@henryso henryso closed this as completed May 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants