change 'test_specified_fields' to check for reverse_accessor fields

[jnoortheen]

in my case, I has reverse accessor field in the search_fields attribute of the ModelAdmin. But the test_specified_fields method is not checking that fields. I've added that checks.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling c9b3f8d on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling ca14752 on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling ca14752 on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling ca14752 on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling ca14752 on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling ca14752 on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling 166fffd on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling 166fffd on jnoortheen:master into ** on greyside:master**.

[PetrDlouhy]

This fixes checking of reverse accessor field problem for me.
But the PR contains some changes, that shouldn't be pulled to the main repository:

• Change of PyPI identifier
• Change of README
• Fabfile with release script (I would i.e. use bumpversion for part of this).

So I would advise some changes in order to get this pulled:

• Rebase to current HEAD and fix tests (if the rebase itself doesn't help)
• Make test for the fix
• Separate the Fabfile to another PR and discuss that change there

[jnoortheen]

It is my mistake. Since there was no activity I updated a PyPI version myself. Since the master branch was directly referred, the changes got it here. I will update it.

[jnoortheen]

I am closing PR and creating another one