We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If flags(empty_t) were not declared explicit, I could do the following:
void f(int x, flags::flags f = flags::empty);
Instead of:
void f(int x, flags::flags f = flags::flags(flags::empty));
..which of course is repetitive and more verbose.
Not a huge deal but maybe worth changing unless there is a more important reason for it to be explicit.
Thanks for the library by the way, I find it quite useful!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If flags(empty_t) were not declared explicit, I could do the following:
void f(int x, flags::flags f = flags::empty);
Instead of:
void f(int x, flags::flags f = flags::flags(flags::empty));
..which of course is repetitive and more verbose.
Not a huge deal but maybe worth changing unless there is a more important reason for it to be explicit.
Thanks for the library by the way, I find it quite useful!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: