protoc-gen-swagger: Update internal mapping for boolean type #1466
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ozraza
force-pushed
the
oas-1463-ozr
branch
4 times, most recently
from
694a29c
to
d0dbeda
Compare
ozraza
changed the title
johanbrandhorst
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2020
|
Thanks for your contribution! Could you please cherry pick this fix against the v2 branch too? Thanks! |
ozraza
added a commit
to ozraza/grpc-gateway
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2020
ozraza
added a commit
to ozraza/grpc-gateway
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2020
|
@johanbrandhorst Fix has been cherry picked against the v2 branch. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Making boolean type consistent with OAS spec.
References to other Issues or PRs
Fixes #1463
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
Yes
Brief description of what is fixed or changed
Removed format field since it is not applicable to boolean type.
Other comments
N/A