Explicit ALTS buffer management to avoid too many ShortBufferException #7049
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e ALTS code. (cl/308901367)
|
Reviewers: jiangtaoli2016, beschmi |
ejona86
approved these changes
May 19, 2020
jiangtaoli2016
approved these changes
May 20, 2020
ejona86
added
the
TODO:backport
ejona86
removed
the
TODO:backport
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To avoid having too many
ShortBufferExceptionthrown in ALTS code path on Java 8, we came up with this workaround creating new managed buffer, filling it, and passing it to underlying Conscrypt not to hit the code path throwing the exception. This might look to introduce another inefficiency but it's more like making it explicit because Conscrypt will do for non-managed buffer which gRPC uses.Fix: #6761