-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 225
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A64: xDS LRS Custom Metrics Support #368
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for writing this up!
Please let me know if you have any questions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good overall! Remaining comments are mostly cosmetic.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!
A64-lrs-custom-metrics.md
Outdated
* Status: Ready for Implementation | ||
* Implemented in: C-core | ||
* Last updated: 2023-05-10 | ||
* Discussion at: TBA |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please go ahead and create the mailing list thread and then add a link here. This is what starts the 2-week timer before we can merge the gRFC.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll wait till 5/26.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good! Just a couple of minor nits remaining, and we need to wait 2 weeks before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, assuming that lack of environment variable protection was on purpose.
Yes, there is none that I am aware of and I think we won't protect this when adding in Java/Go later. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can be merged now.
No description provided.