Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

false positive or bug for a gap? #30

Open
sun-geo opened this issue Jun 29, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

false positive or bug for a gap? #30

sun-geo opened this issue Jun 29, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@sun-geo
Copy link

sun-geo commented Jun 29, 2019

For this relation (r363948)
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=363948
the analyzer shows a gab / marker at this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=3334279845#map=18/54.40937/13.43830
But it seems there is no relation gap.
Is this a false positive or a bug?

btw: thanks for the great tool :-)

@pyrog
Copy link

pyrog commented May 31, 2020

I have a similar issue with the cycle route 4840541.
The map still display a gap fixed more than 7 hours ago and RA claim that the last modification append 7 days ago.

So the "issue" seem more to be a delay in updating the RA database ?

thanks for the great tool :-)

👍

@pyrog
Copy link

pyrog commented Jun 1, 2020

So the "issue" seem more to be a delay in updating the RA database ?

Damned ! I didn't see the checkbox "Always download relation from OSM Server (no cache).", neither the URL parameter noCache=true 😆

So, in my case, this issue could be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants