add coveralls in case we prefer to codacy #160
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We don't really understand the codacy coverage (partly because we were uploading the reports before they were finished possibly? https://github.com/scoverage/sbt-scoverage#multi-project-reports )
Anyway I thought we should try coveralls to see if it's easier to understand, Tip and Scanamo use it already, so it's worth a try.
https://coveralls.io/github/guardian/zuora-auto-cancel
much easier to understand the overall picture from the top level - not sure about PRs yet though
overall picture:
let's give it a go and see whether we can use it more effectively @pvighi @jacobwinch @twrichards
@paulbrown1982