Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak support client side alarm thresholds to reduce noise #336

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 2, 2019

Conversation

jfsoul
Copy link
Contributor

@jfsoul jfsoul commented Jul 1, 2019

This PR should be just matching what we have running, where we have changed threshold handling to reduce noise.

@jfsoul jfsoul requested a review from johnduffell July 1, 2019 13:22
Statistic: Sum
TreatMissingData: notBreaching
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this key TreatMissingData mean, out of curiosity?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It defines what to do in the case that no events of the specified type have been recorded for the evaluation period. E.g. for error alarms we generally treat missing data as good (not breaching), whereas for request count we might treat missing data as bad (breaching) because it is effectively the same as zero in these cases.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 61.403% when pulling a81d675 on jfsoul-patch-1 into 5ff04b8 on master.

@jfsoul jfsoul merged commit d2d5155 into master Jul 2, 2019
@jfsoul jfsoul deleted the jfsoul-patch-1 branch July 2, 2019 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants