Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 27, 2024. It is now read-only.

Create Posts “come-ho-creato-un-sito-con-chat-gpt” #21

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions src/content/posts/come-ho-creato-un-sito-con-chat-gpt.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
---
title: Come ho creato un sito con Chat Gpt
description: sul supporto che i software possono dare all'attività di scrittore
publishedAt: 2023-12-28T11:15:49.384Z
isPublish: true
isDraft: false
---
<!--StartFragment-->

#### Abstract

Human feedback can prevent overtly harmful utterances in conversational models, but may not automatically mitigate subtle problematic behaviors such as a stated desire for self-preservation or power. Constitutional AI offers an alternative, replacing human feedback with feedback from AI models conditioned only on a list of written principles. We find this approach effectively prevents the expression of such behaviors. The success of simple principles motivates us to ask: can models learn general ethical behaviors from only a single written principle? To test this, we run experiments using a principle roughly stated as "do what's best for humanity." We find that the largest dialogue models can generalize from this short constitution, resulting in harmless assistants with no stated interest in specific motivations like power. A general principle may thus partially avoid the need for a long list of constitutions targeting potentially harmful behaviors. However, more detailed constitutions still improve fine-grained control over specific types of harms. This suggests both general and specific principles have value for steering AI safely.

<!--EndFragment-->