Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AutoML: improve handling of model builder params validation #7240

Closed
exalate-issue-sync bot opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

AutoML: improve handling of model builder params validation #7240

exalate-issue-sync bot opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@exalate-issue-sync
Copy link

Currently, when a model fails during validation (e.g. unsupported parameter), the error is simply logged and the entire model is just skipped.

This raises several concerns:

  • if AutoML passes a global param incompatible with the training dataset (e.g. wrong default distribution for regression task), then all models will fail one after another but the training will keep going indefinitely, wasting time and resources.
  • let's imagine that the user passes a param that is only incompatible with one specific algo, then AutoML could be more clever and apply some fallback logic:
    ** try to train model
    ** handle validation errors
    ** if validation errors are parameters errors, reset those params to defaults
    ** rerun model
    ** if validation fails again, skip model
@exalate-issue-sync
Copy link
Author

Sebastien Poirier commented: Note: the fallback logic (retry after switching param back to default after validation error) hasn’t been implemented in this ticket. Need to reconsider if it’s a desired behaviour.

@h2o-ops-ro
Copy link
Collaborator

JIRA Issue Details

Jira Issue: PUBDEV-8420
Assignee: Sebastien Poirier
Reporter: Sebastien Poirier
State: Resolved
Fix Version: 3.36.0.1
Attachments: N/A
Development PRs: Available

@h2o-ops-ro
Copy link
Collaborator

Linked PRs from JIRA

#5938

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant