Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Order of parameters for TargetEncoder in Flow UI is not optimal #8279

Closed
exalate-issue-sync bot opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Order of parameters for TargetEncoder in Flow UI is not optimal #8279

exalate-issue-sync bot opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@exalate-issue-sync
Copy link

First user is being asked to select ignored_columns ( from empty set) and only then comes training_frame parameter

@exalate-issue-sync
Copy link
Author

Andrey Spiridonov commented: This could be seen as part of a bigger thing ( not sure if it is a design or something we want to improve/fix). For auto generation of estimators' parameters names on client sides we need to specify {{fields}} on backend (e.g. {{GBMParametersV3}}) but those parameters are not shared. Probably it is done to have flexibility of specifying order on per algo basis just by hardcoding it in the list of fields.

@h2o-ops
Copy link
Collaborator

h2o-ops commented May 14, 2023

JIRA Issue Migration Info

Jira Issue: PUBDEV-7358
Assignee: Andrey Spiridonov
Reporter: Andrey Spiridonov
State: Resolved
Fix Version: 3.28.1.3
Attachments: N/A
Development PRs: Available

Linked PRs from JIRA

#4387

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant