Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SW-2554] Expose Blending Frame on H2OAutoML #2513

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 28, 2021
Merged

[SW-2554] Expose Blending Frame on H2OAutoML #2513

merged 1 commit into from Apr 28, 2021

Conversation

mn-mikke
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

.gitignore Outdated
Comment on lines 87 to 91
ml/src-gen
scoring/src-gen
py/src-gen
py-scoring/src-gen
r/src-gen
Copy link

@sebhrusen sebhrusen Apr 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI, in gitignore , the following pattern will ignore any subfolder named src-gen

src-gen/

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for confirmation (https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore)

If there is a separator at the beginning or middle (or both) of the pattern, then the pattern is relative to the directory level of the particular .gitignore file itself. Otherwise the pattern may also match at any level below the .gitignore level.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

py-scoring/src-gen worked for me locally, but will change according to your suggestion. Thank you!

Copy link

@sebhrusen sebhrusen Apr 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's just that you were listing all the src-gen modules, and usually you want to exclude those by default.

automl.fit(trainingDateset)
leaderboardWithBlendingDataFrameSet = truncateModelId(automl.getLeaderboard())

unit_test_utils.assert_data_frames_have_different_values(defaultLeaderboard, leaderboardWithBlendingDataFrameSet)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe it would be better to compare only the SEs, and verify that the other models are the same (otherwise you can't prove that the difference in SEs is due to the blending frame).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will improve that, thank you!

Copy link

@sebhrusen sebhrusen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good!

@michalkurka
Copy link

PR as such looks good, I don't have yet full understanding why NullableBigDataFrameParam is necessary but that is discussed in another PR.

Base automatically changed from mn/SW-2545 to master April 27, 2021 16:44
Address Sebastian's comments

(cherry picked from commit 7e0eb21a85c6e7d1318738f6a594212e5f9ec16e)
@mn-mikke mn-mikke merged commit af3172e into master Apr 28, 2021
@mn-mikke mn-mikke deleted the mn/SW-2554 branch April 28, 2021 08:27
mn-mikke added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2021
Address Sebastian's comments

(cherry picked from commit 7e0eb21a85c6e7d1318738f6a594212e5f9ec16e)
(cherry picked from commit af3172e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants