Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency gulp-stylelint to v9 #158

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2019

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 15, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change References
gulp-stylelint devDependencies major 8.0.0 -> 9.0.0 source

Release Notes

olegskl/gulp-stylelint

v9.0.0

Compare Source

Notable changes:

– Bumped stylelint peer dependency to ^10.0.0
– Dropped support for Node <8.15.1


Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 41.933% when pulling 1a187aa on renovate/gulp-stylelint-9.x into a53c995 on development.

@h3llrais3r h3llrais3r merged commit acfebc9 into development Apr 23, 2019
@h3llrais3r h3llrais3r deleted the renovate/gulp-stylelint-9.x branch April 23, 2019 15:37
@h3llrais3r h3llrais3r added dependencies Pull request that updates a dependency javascript Pull request that updates javascript code and removed JS dependency labels Nov 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull request that updates a dependency javascript Pull request that updates javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants