Use of semi-obscure acronyms, question phrasing

[pnevares]

Most acronyms in the document should be painfully obvious to developers with relevant experience but a few stood to me as relatively obscure. The concepts might be well known, but not the jargon. Could these be de-acronymized?

• FOUC
• DNT
• SSE

These entries also seemed out of place:

Write a simple slideshow page
A coding sample has a place in an interview, but not in these questions. Could this be "Describe how you would create a simple slideshow page"?

AMD vs. CommonJS?
Is this asking for personal preference, or a comparison of these projects' features and direction? "What do you think of AMD vs CommonJS?"

Thanks for your time!

[richgilbank]

I'm not opposed to it, particularly for the latter two (DNT and SSE), as some front-end focused devs may not have ever worked directly with them before.

I 100% agree about Write a simple slideshow page. It's not a question, and a list of Front end Developer Interview Tasks could be an entirely separate project 😏

👍 on the module loader question too.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, yes. Yes to all the things! Feel free to submit a PR, I'd be happy to give it my approval.