Fix % display in libhpc

[rvhonorato]

You are about to submit a new Pull Request. Before continuing make sure you read the contributing guidelines and you comply with the following criteria:

• You have stick to Python. Talk with us before adding other programming languages to HADDOCK3
• Your PR is about CNS
• Your code is well documented: proper docstrings and explanatory comments for those tricky parts
• You structured the code into small functions as much as possible. You can use classes if there's a (state) purpose
• code follows our coding style
• You wrote tests for the new code
• tox tests pass. Run tox command inside the repository folder
• -test.cfg examples execute without errors. Inside examples/ run python run_tests.py -b
• PR does not add any install dependencies unless permission granted by the HADDOCK team
• PR does not break licensing
• Your PR is about writing documentation for already existing code 🔥
• Your PR is about writing tests for already existing code

---

Fix #358

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #360 (57935c0) into main (850cf65) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #360      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.41%   61.45%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        4266     4263       -3     
==========================================
  Hits         2620     2620              
+ Misses       1646     1643       -3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/haddock/libs/libhpc.py	21.01% <0.00%> (+0.44%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 850cf65...57935c0. Read the comment docs.

[amjjbonvin]

Ok - so the reported percentages are now from the currently running jobs (i.e. in the worker list) and not the total number of requested models, correct?

[rvhonorato]

It is reported now by batch (with then depends on the queue_limit)

[2022-03-07 12:16:01,865 libhpc INFO] Concatenating, each .job will produce 5 (or less) models
[2022-03-07 12:16:01,865 libhpc INFO] > Running batch 1/1
[2022-03-07 12:16:01,910 libhpc INFO] >> topoaa_1.job submitted
[2022-03-07 12:16:01,911 libhpc INFO] >> Waiting... (10.00s)
[2022-03-07 12:16:11,943 libhpc INFO] >> Batch 1/1 took 10.08s to finish, 100.00% complete

...
2022-03-07 12:16:57,370 libhpc INFO] >> rigidbody_99.job running
[2022-03-07 12:16:57,395 libhpc INFO] >> rigidbody_100.job running
[2022-03-07 12:16:57,398 libhpc INFO] >> Waiting... (60.00s)
[2022-03-07 12:17:59,970 libhpc INFO] >> Batch 1/6 took 67.45s to finish, 16.67% complete
[2022-03-07 12:17:59,971 libhpc INFO] > Running batch 2/6
[2022-03-07 12:18:02,325 libhpc INFO] >> rigidbody_101.job running
[2022-03-07 12:18:02,352 libhpc INFO] >> rigidbody_102.job running
...