Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pdb_reres was ignoring MODEL lines #69

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2020

Conversation

joaomcteixeira
Copy link
Member

* `pdb_reres` was ignoring `MODEL` lines, and these were omitted
  in the output
* `MODEL` lines are now piped to the output.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #69 into master will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.69%   81.76%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          44       44              
  Lines        3530     3532       +2     
  Branches      741      741              
==========================================
+ Hits         2884     2888       +4     
+ Misses        456      455       -1     
+ Partials      190      189       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pdbtools/pdb_reres.py 88.17% <100.00%> (+2.45%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6ca7a06...3250b15. Read the comment docs.

@joaomcteixeira
Copy link
Member Author

I am preparing the tests

* tests against MODELS of a single residue
* tests against MODELS of multiple residues
* created a new tests/data file.
@joaomcteixeira
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @JoaoRodrigues

With the tests, the CI passes properly, give it a look and let me know if you find it appropriate for merge or not.

@JoaoRodrigues JoaoRodrigues merged commit 39da31b into haddocking:master Aug 2, 2020
@JoaoRodrigues
Copy link
Member

Thanks @joaomcteixeira !

@joaomcteixeira joaomcteixeira deleted the pdb_reres_model branch August 2, 2020 10:26
@joaomcteixeira joaomcteixeira linked an issue Aug 2, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pdb_reres removes the MODEL tag from multi-model PDB files
2 participants