Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy: Preliminary citation vs. citation in published metadata record #17

Closed
timvdstap opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 12 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working IYS

Comments

@timvdstap
Copy link
Collaborator

It seems that in metadata records in IYS CKAN, the NPAFC is included in the citation, see e.g. here. In the metadata intake form, the NPAFC is listed as 'Publisher' and not included in the preliminary citation (which is preferred for us). Any reason why there's a discrepancy in what's shown in the preliminary citation, and in the CKAN records?

@Br-Johnson
Copy link

I think the publisher should have it's own section like how DataCite formats citations:

Creator (PublicationYear). Title. Publisher. Identifier

https://datacite.org/cite-your-data.html

@Br-Johnson Br-Johnson assigned Br-Johnson and fostermh and unassigned Br-Johnson Jan 12, 2022
@Br-Johnson Br-Johnson added bug Something isn't working IYS labels Jan 12, 2022
@Br-Johnson
Copy link

This is still an issue

@fostermh
Copy link

Jan 14th update may have fixed this, please confirm.

@Br-Johnson
Copy link

Looks good now! Thanks @fostermh.

@Br-Johnson
Copy link

NPAFC is removed from IYS records, however, now I see that in the Hakai catalogue people with the role 'Contributor' are being included in the recommended citation in CKAN. That's different than in the metadata intake form preview @fostermh @n-a-t-e

@timvdstap
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm not sure this is fixed, because I see North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission still included in the citation, though now in a separate section (whereas I believe it should be omitted from the citation all together).

image

@Br-Johnson
Copy link

NPAFC is included in the citation because they are listed as the Publisher in the metadata record. Including the publisher in the citation is actually the preferred standard from DataCite. From the DataCite metadata schema:

"The following is the preferred format for rendering a DataCite citation for human readers using the mandatory properties of the schema:

Creator (PublicationYear): Title. Publisher. (resourceTypeGeneral). Identifier"

OR where there are versions:

Creator (PublicationYear): Title. Version. Publisher. (resourceTypeGeneral). Identifier

@timvdstap
Copy link
Collaborator Author

My bad, thanks for clarifying @Br-Johnson !

@Br-Johnson
Copy link

Mind you I just noticed that the order in which the publisher and resourceTypeGeneral are displayed in CKAN is backwards.

The order according to DataCite reccommendations should be:

"Creator (PublicationYear): Title. Publisher. (resourceTypeGeneral). Identifier

and currently it's

Creator (PublicationYear): Title. (resourceTypeGeneral). Publisher. Identifier

Lastly, identifying a publisher in the metadata intake form is not documented with tool tips and the publisher is not included in the preview.

@fostermh
Copy link

The javascript library we are using to generate the citation does not have a DataCite format option. what you are seeing by default is APA. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/data-set-references

@fostermh
Copy link

btw, you probably already know about this service but it was new to me. https://citation.crosscite.org/

@fostermh
Copy link

as far as ckan is concerned this issue appears to be solved. If that is not the case, please re-open the issue and provide more detail as to what is not working.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working IYS
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants