pref: allow annotations value to be empty #4419
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f2c-ci-robot
bot
added
release-note
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4419 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 60.99% 60.99%
Complexity 2507 2507
=========================================
Files 370 370
Lines 12910 12910
Branches 928 928
=========================================
Hits 7874 7874
Misses 4581 4581
Partials 455 455 |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
added
the
approved
ruibaby
changed the title
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: guqing, ruibaby The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind improvement
What this PR does / why we need it:
由于后端 annotation 的值可以为空，而前端则规定 annotation 值为必填项，因此去除前端必填属性。
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4279
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?