Which source to cite?

[alexvong243f]

It seems the link: (Japanese) https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/kobe/20190304/2020003239.html is now dead. Can others reproduce it?

[yuta0801]

I can't reproduce it in Japan. NHK may be blocking access from abroad.
You may be able to read it from the archive.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190309122153/https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/kobe/20190304/2020003239.html

added 3/13
I reproduced it today, it was probably removed

[alexvong243f]

yuta0801 <notifications@github.com> writes:

I can't reproduce it in Japan. NHK may be blocking access from abroad. You may be able to read it from the archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20190309122153/https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/kobe/20190304/2020003239.html

Thanks for suggesting the trick! I am closing this.

…

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[matarillo]

It seems that NHK NEWS WEB deletes its news pages after one week from the publication date.
I cannot find NHK's official policy about the retention period but a blog post which is listing observed policies of TV broadcasters' web news sites in Japan.
https://www.picsim-blog.com/entry/311_2017-3-11

[hamukazu]

I am thinking of replacing it with this news article:
https://www.sanspo.com/geino/news/20190304/tro19030418410013-n1.html

I think a replacing site should be a reliable publisher, not a personal blog. Is there any better idea?
Let's discuss here.

[matarillo]

Except for personal blogs, I found these two posts below:

• https://www.bengo4.com/c_23/n_9333/
• https://biz-journal.jp/2019/03/post_27012.html

In my opinion, sanspo.com is more "reliable".

[alexvong243f]

Kimikazu Kato <notifications@github.com> writes:

I am thinking of replacing it with this news article: https://www.sanspo.com/geino/news/20190304/tro19030418410013-n1.html I think a replacing site should be a reliable publisher, not a personal blog. Is there any better idea? Let's discuss here.

This sounds resonable to me. Wikipedia has similar policy. It requires reliable, published sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources and perceive self-published sources (e.g. personal blog) as unreliable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#News_organizations

…

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.