Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Credibility regions without KDE #204

Open
williamjameshandley opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Credibility regions without KDE #204

williamjameshandley opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@williamjameshandley
Copy link
Collaborator

Since the title of #178 is centered around the iso_probability_contours functionality which is being implemented in #188 (it might be good to also have a KDE-based version alongside @Stefan-Heimersheim's kde-less estimates), I would like to collect the other ideas for 2d plots in a separate issue.

critical idea from @Stefan-Heimersheim
proof for D-dimensions

The basic idea is that '67% iso-probability contour' and 'minimum area contour containing 67% of the probability mass' are equivalent. The latter definition in theory means one could produce credibility regions without estimating the probability density directly, i.e. credibility regions without KDEs.

My first thoughts on this would be to use a triangulation/voronoi diagram (possibly smoothed/estimated) to get area estimates for each sample, and construct an algorithm for assembling the minimum area containing 67% probability mass (which sounds on the face of it like a relatively straightforward constrained optimisation problem). Likely issues will arise with noisiness of area estimation from random samples (as one finds when doing single-point histograms).

@williamjameshandley williamjameshandley added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Aug 8, 2022
@williamjameshandley williamjameshandley added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant