Docs: Edit 12.4.0 docs

[kirszenbaum]

This PR:

• Edits the 12.4.0 changelog entries
• Adds 12.4.0 release notes
• Updates the docs' CodeSandbox demos to forked ones with updated HoT dependencies
• In the Bare distribution section of the Packages page, updates the dompurify version to 2.4.5
• Updates links in the Find the code on GitHub section
• Applies further changes listed below

New hooks: afterColumnSequenceChange and afterRowSequenceChange

• Fixed the API refs of the newly-added hooks (they didn't show up in the docs)
• Rewrote the hooks' API descriptions

Formula calculation page

• Rewrote and moved the top-of-the-page warning about IndexMapper into a new Known limitations section
• Removed nested rows and undo/redo from the list of features unsupported by formulas (as per Added new afterColumnSequenceChange and afterRowSequenceChange hooks and synchronization of actions done on HOT with HF's engine #10215)
• Cleaned up formulas' known limitations

[skip changelog]

[github-actions]

Launch the local version of documentation by running:

npm run docs:review 4d2c61fe328c95fd38f68c0a6cbe79fcfad82ec4

[jansiegel]

@kirszenbaum
Is there a reason why you changed the @param type from a list of possible values to {string}?
I can't find it in the JSDoc documentation, but I think it's a valid syntax 🤔

[kirszenbaum]

@jansiegel it works, but it renders, for example, like this (source > output):

I guess we should keep the syntax and create an issue for rendering it properly?

[jansiegel]

@kirszenbaum I'd think so, @wszymanski WDYT?

[wszymanski]

We don't have lot of places typed in JSDoc in that way, but they exist. For example, we can see how it look like for DataMap's method: https://handsontable.com/docs/javascript-data-grid/api/data-map/#createrow. Probably the docs engine should be changed, not the documentation.

[kirszenbaum]

@jansiegel @wszymanski ok, done: 3a2f19a

[AMBudnik]

I just run the new docs and the issue still looks the same for the createRow as long as for the new hooks. @kirszenbaum were those changes merged? (It seems that they should be merged with the 12.4.0 docs)

[kirszenbaum]

@AMBudnik – that's the expected outcome (as discussed here). The JSDocs syntax is correct but we need to fix the way it's rendered in the docs. I'll create an issue for that.