fix using magic-classes in field #132
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates to Changes
Assessment against linked issues
PoemIn the realm of code where the magic's spun, Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (10)
- examples/use_menubar.py (2 hunks)
- magicclass/_app.py (2 hunks)
- magicclass/_gui/_base.py (2 hunks)
- magicclass/_gui/_macro.py (1 hunks)
- magicclass/_gui/class_gui.py (1 hunks)
- magicclass/_gui/utils.py (1 hunks)
- magicclass/fields/_fields.py (2 hunks)
- magicclass/testing/_gui_test.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_choices.py (2 hunks)
- tests/test_fields.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 15
magicclass/_app.py (1)
- 46-47: The modification to
run_appcorrectly adds a condition to check if the "%gui qt" magic is active before executing the application. This change should be tested to ensure that the application's behavior is as expected when the "%gui qt" magic is not active.examples/use_menubar.py (2)
- 56-56: The
fielddeclaration has been added to replace the previousImagedeclaration. Ensure that thefieldis properly initialized and used throughout the class.Verification successful
I will refine the ast-grep pattern to correctly match the expected code structure and verify the usage of the
fielddeclaration within theMainclass.
I will now use the
rgcommand to search for thefielddeclaration within theMainclass in theuse_menubar.pyfile to verify its usage.
I will now use the
fdcommand to find the exact location of theuse_menubar.pyfile within the repository to ensure that we are searching in the correct file.
I will now use the
catcommand to display the contents of theuse_menubar.pyfile to manually inspect the usage of thefielddeclaration within theMainclass.
The contents of
use_menubar.pyconfirm the presence of thefielddeclaration within theMainclass. Thefieldis initialized withImage, which is imported frommagicgui.widgets. This matches the change described in the PR summary, where theImagedeclaration was replaced with afielddeclaration from themagicclassmodule.The methods
Open_image,Save_image,Gaussian_filter, andSobel_filterwithin theMainclass use theimageattribute, which is now afieldcontaining anImage. This suggests that thefielddeclaration is being used correctly to handle image data within the class.Based on the provided output, the
fielddeclaration in theMainclass of theuse_menubar.pyfile is verified to be correctly implemented as per the changes described in the PR.* 53-54: The `Sobel_filter` method correctly updates the `image` attribute using the new `field` declaration. Ensure that the method is tested to verify that the image processing is performed correctly.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the field declaration is properly used in the Main class ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class Main { $$$ image = field($_) $$$ }'Length of output: 428
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Refine the ast-grep pattern to match the field declaration within the Main class ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class Main { $$$ field($_) $$$ }'Length of output: 420
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the field declaration within the Main class in the use_menubar.py file rg "class Main" -A 10 examples/use_menubar.py | rg "field"Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the location of the use_menubar.py file within the repository fd use_menubar.pyLength of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of the use_menubar.py file cat examples/use_menubar.pyLength of output: 1536
magicclass/_gui/utils.py (1)
- 52-52: The change in the
copy_classfunction corrects the comparison condition for thekeyvariable. This is a simple syntax correction that should not affect the functionality, but it's good to ensure that there are tests covering this function to prevent regression.magicclass/testing/_gui_test.py (1)
- 70-75: The expanded docstring for the
check_function_gui_buildablefunction provides additional clarity on its purpose, specifically mentioning the detection of errors related to method annotations. This is a good practice for maintainability and clarity of the testing code.tests/test_choices.py (2)
1-1: The import of
Annotatedfrom thetypingmodule is necessary for the new test functiontest_field_in_other_class. This is a standard practice for using type annotations with additional metadata in Python.116-130: The new test function
test_field_in_other_classis added to verify the functionality of fields in different classes. Ensure that this test function is executed and covers the expected scenarios for the field choices.tests/test_fields.py (1)
- 800-824: The new test function
test_using_same_classis well-structured and performs assertions on the attributes and methods of theLaserandLaserControlclasses. It is important to ensure that this test is included in the test suite and that it passes successfully.Verification successful
The
test_using_same_classfunction is confirmed to be present within thetests/test_fields.pyfile.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the test_using_same_class function is included in the test suite rg --type python "def test_using_same_class"Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the test_using_same_class function is included in the test suite # Removing the file type specification to ensure ripgrep searches all text files rg "def test_using_same_class"Length of output: 82
magicclass/fields/_fields.py (4)
357-361: The change in the parameter type of the
as_remote_gettermethod fromAnytoMagicTemplateis consistent with the PR objectives to make the behavior of magic classes more predictable and user-controlled. The docstring has been updated accordingly, which is good for maintaining clarity in the codebase.368-374: The error handling in the
as_remote_gettermethod provides a clear message when theobjnameis not found withinclsnames. This is an improvement in code clarity and correctness, aligning with the PR objectives.384-388: The logic to navigate nested class structures in the
as_remote_gettermethod is sound. It correctly identifies the instance of the parent class and retrieves the appropriate widget. The error handling for when the widget does not have avalueattribute is also appropriate, ensuring type safety.354-361: > Note: This review was outside the patches, and no patch overlapping with it was found. Original lines [1-353]
The rest of the
MagicFieldclass and related functions appear to be unchanged in this hunk. The existing code should be assumed to be correct and functional as per the instructions. Therefore, no further comments are necessary for the unchanged parts of the code.magicclass/_gui/_base.py (3)
765-770: The addition of a title separator with a close button to the
FunctionGuiPlusis a good UX improvement, allowing users to dismiss the GUI easily.1263-1268: The conditional logic within the
convert_attributesfunction has been modified to handle instances of_MagicTemplateMetaby creating a copy of the object. This change seems to be part of the refactoring process to avoid redundant copies and incorrect references.765-770: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [765-1268]
To ensure that the changes made to the
MagicTemplateclass and theconvert_attributesfunction do not introduce any regressions, it would be beneficial to run the existing test suite and, if possible, perform manual testing of the affected functionality.
| def show(self, run: bool = True) -> None: | ||
| """ | ||
| Show GUI. If any of the parent GUI is a dock widget in napari, then this | ||
| will also show up as a dock widget (floating if in popup mode). | ||
|
|
||
| Parameters | ||
| ---------- | ||
| run : bool, default False | ||
| run : bool, default True | ||
| If true, application gets executed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The default value for the run parameter in the show method has been changed to True. This change will start the event loop by default when show is called. Ensure that all existing calls to this method without specifying the run parameter are reviewed to prevent unintended behavior changes in the application flow.
| @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ def _execute(self, code: Expr): | |||
| """Run macro.""" | |||
| parent = self._search_parent_magicclass() | |||
| ns = {Symbol.var("ui"): parent} | |||
| with parent._error_mode.raise_with_handler(self): | |||
| with parent._error_mode.raise_with_handler(parent): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The context manager in the _execute method has been modified. Previously, it used parent._error_mode.raise_with_handler(parent) to handle errors, but now it uses parent directly. Verify that the new context manager setup correctly handles errors and that the change does not introduce any regression in error handling.
| def gui_qt_is_active() -> bool: | ||
| """True only if "%gui qt" magic is called in ipython kernel.""" | ||
| shell = get_shell() | ||
|
|
||
| return shell and shell.active_eventloop == "qt" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 NOTE
Codebase verification is a beta feature.
The search for references to the gui_qt_is_active function within Python files only returned occurrences in the magicclass/_app.py file itself. There were no test files listed in the output, suggesting that there may not be any direct tests for this function. However, without seeing the full structure of the test directory, it's not possible to conclusively determine the absence of relevant tests.
Given the information at hand, it appears that the gui_qt_is_active function may not be explicitly covered by unit tests. It is recommended to add tests to ensure its correct behavior, or if tests do exist but were not captured by the search, to verify that they adequately cover the new function.
Analysis chain
The new function gui_qt_is_active correctly checks the IPython kernel for the active event loop. Ensure that this function is covered by unit tests to validate its behavior in different scenarios.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the gui_qt_is_active function is covered by tests
rg --type python "def test_gui_qt_is_active"
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the gui_qt_is_active function is covered by tests
rg "def test_gui_qt_is_active"
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the gui_qt_is_active function within test files
rg "gui_qt_is_active" --type py
Length of output: 132
There were redundant copy during magicclass construction, which caused wrong reference.
This PR also fixes #131.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Mainclass.showmethod to run by default.Refactor
as_remote_getterfor better context usage._executemethod of macros.convert_attributesfunction and thecopy_classutility.Bug Fixes
keycomparison in thecopy_classfunction.Documentation
Style