New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Linux] deb/dpkg package should not depend on libmpv-dev #387
Comments
So, does that mean I should only depend on Thanks a lot! |
Exactly, unless you directly use mpv as binary libmpv2 is enough. |
So... It seems that This situation creates ambiguity. While depending directly upon Additionally, AFAIK |
Not really,
it actually means that many packages and 28.3MB I can see that libmpv2 is in Debian unstable/testing so it will be released in the next stable ubuntu and derivatives. I think it's possible that actually it should be libmpv1 which is also available but it would need some investigation to check. |
I thought about getting this out with today's update, but I kind of lost it when I couldn't locate |
I think a usable package with not perfect dependencies is still better than no package at all. |
Describe the bug
DEB package should not depend on libmpv-dev but on libmpv2. Packages that are not development libraries should not depend on -dev packages because it creates huge, necessary dependencies.
Expected behavior
libmpv2 is a sufficient dependency.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: