You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fair
normal_reference: 0.2689687852105908
nrd0: 0.2285370639409318
Good
normal_reference: 0.35873214763916517
nrd0: 0.30480708643752136
Very Good
normal_reference: 0.22284759734989557
nrd0: 0.18934887022210023
Premium
normal_reference: 0.18242428971018324
nrd0: 0.15500204430500442
Ideal
normal_reference: 0.09605607167961927
nrd0: 0.08161680389109885
where the normal_reference values are pre v0.7.0 and nrd0 values are v0.7.0. So far, it not clear to me why that would result in significantly more memory being used. nrd0 bandwidth is slightly the lesser for each group; that means when computing the density there are fewer points under each kernel function and therefore more kernel functions. I do not know how much memory travis allocates may be that difference is enough to tip it over in this case.
TODO NEXT: Find out the differences in memory used for these density computations.
The build for Pythonplot.com started failing with 0.7.0 trying to run
I get a memory error thrown by statsmodels which you can see in the build log.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: