Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

round 161019673 TokenMint fee mismatch #11320

Closed
kimbor opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #11464
Closed

round 161019673 TokenMint fee mismatch #11320

kimbor opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #11464
Assignees
Labels
Modularization Issues or PRs related to modularization

Comments

@kimbor
Copy link
Member

kimbor commented Feb 1, 2024

Problem

When doing differential testing for round 161019673 there is a TokenMint fee mismatch:

---- TokenMint DIFFERED (TRANSACTION_RECORD_MISMATCH) ----
Transaction fees '28798394' and '27957298' varied by more than 1 tinybar - Matching field 'transactionFee' ==> expected: but was:

For body,
transactionID {
transactionValidStart {
seconds: 1706699700
nanos: 817090402
}
accountID {
accountNum: 1025896
}
}
nodeAccountID {
accountNum: 8
}
transactionFee: 10000000000
transactionValidDuration {
seconds: 120
}
tokenMint {
token {
tokenNum: 4270178
}
metadata: "ipfs://QmWsvhbUVrt3gjBR9yrLBX6PvAhDTuN7i8bSAax7Rs6oXH"
}
➡️ Expected Receipt status: SUCCESS
exchangeRate {
currentRate {
hbarEquiv: 30000
centEquiv: 214613
expirationTime {
seconds: 1706702400
}
}
nextRate {
hbarEquiv: 30000
centEquiv: 212386
expirationTime {
seconds: 1706706000
}
}
}
newTotalSupply: 567
serialNumbers: 567
but was status: SUCCESS
exchangeRate {
currentRate {
hbarEquiv: 30000
centEquiv: 214613
expirationTime {
seconds: 1706702400
}
}
nextRate {
hbarEquiv: 30000
centEquiv: 212386
expirationTime {
seconds: 1706706000
}
}
}
newTotalSupply: 567
serialNumbers: 567

Solution

Fix it!

Alternatives

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Modularization Issues or PRs related to modularization
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants