-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Detect Vault 1.11+ import, update default issuer #15253
Merged
kisunji
merged 14 commits into
hashicorp:main
from
cipherboy:fix-issuer-growing-list-maybe-from-vault
Nov 17, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eeed745
Detect Vault 1.11+ import, update default issuer
cipherboy 1fd1f89
More commentary
cipherboy 067113d
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issuer-growing-list-maybe-from-vault
kisunji 7074c98
Refactored setting default intermediate issuer
kisunji e117b64
Fix commit message
kisunji 0bd2b7d
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issuer-growing-list-maybe-from-vault
kisunji 313c025
Address PR feedback
kisunji 9b8613f
Minor formatting cleanup
kisunji 80ae5c5
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issuer-growing-list-maybe-from-vault
kisunji 1ff1189
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issuer-growing-list-maybe-from-vault
kisunji 7625c05
Add unit test
kisunji 37e0216
Remove unnecessary line
kisunji 7647728
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issuer-growing-list-maybe-from-vault
kisunji 90124a8
Add changelog
kisunji File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -902,6 +902,29 @@ func TestVaultProvider_ReconfigureIntermediateTTL(t *testing.T) { | |
require.Equal(t, 333*3600, mountConfig.MaxLeaseTTL) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestVaultCAProvider_GenerateIntermediate(t *testing.T) { | ||
|
||
SkipIfVaultNotPresent(t) | ||
|
||
provider, testVault := testVaultProviderWithConfig(t, true, nil) | ||
_ = testVault | ||
|
||
orig, err := provider.ActiveIntermediate() | ||
require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Wow you weren't joking this did turn out to be easier than we thought! Nice work! |
||
// This test was created to ensure that our calls to Vault | ||
// returns a new Intermediate certificate and further calls | ||
// to ActiveIntermediate return the same new cert. | ||
new, err := provider.GenerateIntermediate() | ||
require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
||
newActive, err := provider.ActiveIntermediate() | ||
require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
||
require.Equal(t, new, newActive) | ||
require.NotEqual(t, orig, new) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func getIntermediateCertTTL(t *testing.T, caConf *structs.CAConfiguration) time.Duration { | ||
t.Helper() | ||
|
||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unsure if Vault tests will run so I'm pasting local findings here:
Vault 1.10.8 without changes (expected to pass in Vault <1.11)
Vault 1.10.8 with changes (regression test)
Vault 1.11.0 without changes
Vault 1.11.0 with changes
Also tested with Vault 1.12.1 with same results as 1.11.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for including this detail :)