Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid ignoring schema for uninitialized module #301

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Conversation

radeksimko
Copy link
Member

@radeksimko radeksimko commented Nov 16, 2020

This was just overlooked in the big PR #281

#281 did (correctly) provide basic schema in cases where e.g. modules were initialized, but no provider schema available (e.g. because of backend auth).

This patch just delivers on the originally stated promise as mentioned in the changelog - i.e. to provide limited schema even to folks which have not initialized anything at all, i.e. there is no .terraform folder.

@radeksimko radeksimko added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 16, 2020
@radeksimko radeksimko requested a review from a team November 16, 2020 12:42
@radeksimko radeksimko marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2020 13:07
@appilon appilon mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2020
@radeksimko radeksimko merged commit 87ee313 into master Nov 17, 2020
@radeksimko radeksimko deleted the b-fall-back-schema branch November 17, 2020 07:50
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 17, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the context necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants