Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resource/elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template: Handle missing platform #1222

Merged

Conversation

stack72
Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 commented Jul 24, 2017

When a platform was removed by AWS, Terraform failed in the following
manner:

Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template.my_app: aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template.my_app: InvalidParameterValue: No Platform named 'arn:aws:elasticbeanstalk:us-east-1::platform/Multi-container Docker running on 64bit Amazon Linux/2.7.1' found.
    status code: 400

Terraform should handle the missing platform error in the same way it handles the missing config template error - it will plan to remove it from state and then readd it

This was reported in HangOps - https://hangops.slack.com/archives/C0Z93TPFX/p1500904037044893

@stack72 stack72 force-pushed the b-aws-beanstalk-missing-platform branch from c3756bc to 163ba1c Compare July 24, 2017 14:15
…tform

When a platform was removed by AWS, Terraform failed in the following
manner:

```
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template.my_app: aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template.my_app: InvalidParameterValue: No Platform named 'arn:aws:elasticbeanstalk:us-east-1::platform/Multi-container Docker running on 64bit Amazon Linux/2.7.1' found.
    status code: 400
```

Terraform should handle the missing platform error in the same way it handles the missing config template error - it will plan to remove it from state and then readd it
@stack72 stack72 force-pushed the b-aws-beanstalk-missing-platform branch from 163ba1c to 2606c88 Compare July 24, 2017 14:15
Copy link
Contributor

@grubernaut grubernaut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 11, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants