Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resource/aws_route53_record: Remove deprecation from allow_overwrite argument #8274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2019

Conversation

bflad
Copy link
Contributor

@bflad bflad commented Apr 10, 2019

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" comments, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Closes #7846

Route53 Record UPSERT on creation does have some minor valid use cases. We will keep this argument for now while discouraging its usage in the documentation.

Output from acceptance testing:

--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_allowOverwrite (149.81s)

…` argument

Reference: #7846

Route53 Record `UPSERT` on creation does have some minor valid use cases. We will keep this argument for now while discouraging its usage in the documentation.

Output from acceptance testing:

```
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_allowOverwrite (149.81s)
```
@bflad bflad added service/route53 Issues and PRs that pertain to the route53 service. technical-debt Addresses areas of the codebase that need refactoring or redesign. labels Apr 10, 2019
@bflad bflad requested a review from a team April 10, 2019 15:46
@ghost ghost added documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Apr 10, 2019
Copy link
Member

@nywilken nywilken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Optional: true,
Computed: true,
Deprecated: "The next major version of the Terraform AWS Provider will require importing existing records",
Type: schema.TypeBool,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where there any tests removed when the attribute was deprecated that should be restored?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope we don't tend to remove testing on deprecations as the functionality is still expected to work as it did previously. 👍 Here's the deprecation pull request for verification: #7734

@bflad bflad added this to the v2.6.0 milestone Apr 10, 2019
@bflad bflad merged commit e5073b9 into master Apr 10, 2019
@bflad bflad deleted the td-aws_route53_record-remove-deprecation branch April 10, 2019 16:57
bflad added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 30, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 30, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. service/route53 Issues and PRs that pertain to the route53 service. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. technical-debt Addresses areas of the codebase that need refactoring or redesign.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

aws_route53_record allow_overwrite deprecation will break ability to update SOA
2 participants