VM/VMSS: support for StandardSSD_LRS managed disk type
#1901
Conversation
ghost
added
the
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @ira-bryndzei,
Thank you for this contribution. One of the test is failing (TestAccAzureRMManagedDisk_update) I believe because a step was accidentally added.
Additionally, could we get some tests to verify the new storage type works?
| @@ -131,6 +131,17 @@ func TestAccAzureRMManagedDisk_update(t *testing.T) { | |||
| Providers: testAccProviders, | |||
| CheckDestroy: testCheckAzureRMManagedDiskDestroy, | |||
| Steps: []resource.TestStep{ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe this test step is in error, it causes a failure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@katbyte thanks for your reply. I'll take a look at it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@katbyte Is it possible to run acceptance test authenticating using the Azure CLІ with user account as I have no ability to create service principal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, currently you need a SP to run them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to give some additional information here, this test is failing because the configuration in the preConfig is being used for multiple entries (with different storage account types) - whereas the configuration actually creates a disk of the storage account type compute.StorageAccountTypesStandardLRS. It should be possible to add another configuration which includes the different storage account type to allow this to pass
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ira-bryndzei it's probably easiest to revert the additional test block in this file (but leave the updated constant/enum name) for the moment (we can then push a new test for this new disk type in a follow up commit) - what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tombuildsstuff that's work for me. I'll revert that block
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tombuildsstuff I deleted that block
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 thanks - I've pushed a couple of commits (one to add the new values to the docs, which I'd missed before; and another to add the tests as discussed above) - I hope you don't mind!
katbyte
added
enhancement
service/virtual-machine
service/vmss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hey @ira-bryndzei
Thanks for pushing those changes - this now LGTM 👍
tombuildsstuff
changed the title
tombuildsstuff
changed the title
StandardSSD_LRS managed disk type
tombuildsstuff
force-pushed
the
support_StorageAccountTypesStandardSSDLRS
branch
from
c75c08d
to
bb4792f
Compare
|
Ignoring a temporary transitory issue the tests pass:
|
|
When can we expect this to be available to use? |
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
There is new StandardSSDLRS disk type in Azure cloud and Go Azure SDK now supports StandardSSDLRS disk type so I updated provider to use it in arm_managed_disk arm_virtual_machine and arm_virtual_machine_scale_set resources. And also Go SDK now returns StorageAccountTypes* values for storage account so I updated them too.
(fixes #1432)