Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_service_fabric_cluster - support for specifying the cluster code version #1945

Merged

Conversation

steve-hawkins
Copy link
Contributor

this should resolve #1906

@ghost ghost added the size/M label Sep 19, 2018
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @steve-hawkins,

Thank you for adding this property, it looks great outside aside from a couple minor comments I've left inline.

Look forward to getting this merged soon

.gitattributes Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
# make sure all .go files stay LF, this will help developers on Windows
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is outside of the scope of this PR.

azurerm/resource_arm_service_fabric_cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
func testAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualClusterCodeVersion(rInt int, location, clusterCodeVersion string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "azurerm_resource_group" "test" {
name = "acctestRG-%[1]d"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very minor but could we align these assignments?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry copy and paste job

@steve-hawkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

I must be doing something wrong in the acceptance test as I get the following:-

$ make fmt; make testacc TEST=./azurerm TESTARGS=-test.run=TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualClusterCodeVersion
gofmt -w $(find . -name '*.go' |grep -v vendor)
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./azurerm -v -test.run=TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualClusterCodeVersion -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualClusterCodeVersion
--- FAIL: TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualClusterCodeVersion (57.59s)
    testing.go:513: Step 1 error: ImportStateVerify attributes not equivalent. Difference is shown below. Top is actual, bottom is expected.

        (map[string]string) {
        }


        (map[string]string) (len=1) {
         (string) (len=20) "cluster_code_version": (string) (len=12) "6.3.176.9494"
        }

FAIL
FAIL    github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm       59.535s
make: *** [testacc] Error 1

forgive me as I have only just started learning GoLang and contributing to this project

I get that it appears to not find the attribute key cluster_code_version or a value, but I can't figure out how the TestCheckResourceAttr function in testing.go actually checks the resource?

I know my change works as I have tested it manually, but I cannot figure out how to get the acceptance test working

any help appreciated

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Sep 19, 2018

@steve-hawkins,

What is happening is on import, the cluster_code_version is not being saved into state so the verification step fails. Which is a bit weird because at first glance it the code looks correct.

@ghost ghost added the size/M label Sep 19, 2018
@@ -423,6 +433,7 @@ func resourceArmServiceFabricClusterRead(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{
d.Set("management_endpoint", props.ManagementEndpoint)
d.Set("reliability_level", string(props.ReliabilityLevel))
d.Set("upgrade_mode", string(props.UpgradeMode))
d.Set("cluster_code_version ", props.ClusterCodeVersion)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the test failure here is because there's a space at the end of this string (so the d.Set can't find a matching property in the schema called cluster_code_version [note the space] - so the Set fails)?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@steve-hawkins since this PR otherwise LGTM - I hope you don't mind but I've pushed a commit to remove the extra space (and will kick off the tests now)

@@ -372,6 +381,7 @@ func resourceArmServiceFabricClusterUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interfac
NodeTypes: nodeTypes,
ReliabilityLevel: servicefabric.ReliabilityLevel1(reliabilityLevel),
UpgradeMode: servicefabric.UpgradeMode1(upgradeMode),
ClusterCodeVersion: utils.String(clusterCodeVersion),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we've run the test suite here and this fails because the ClusterCodeVersion is an empty string when it's not specified (so this fails on the API Validation):

* azurerm_service_fabric_cluster.test: Error creating Service Fabric Cluster "acctest-9043244035322992792" (Resource Group "acctestRG-9043244035322992792"): servicefabric.ClustersClient#Create: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: autorest/azure: Service returned an error. Status=400 Code="InvalidRequestFormat" Message="Cannot parse the request." Details=[{"code":"InvalidRequestFormat","message":"Error parsing version string:. Path 'properties.clusterCodeVersion', line 1, position 115."}]

could we update this to only set the field if it's got a value? e.g.

if clusterCodeVersion != "" {
  parameters.ClusterPropertiesUpdateParameters.ClusterCodeVersion = utils.String(clusterCodeVersion)
}

(we also need to update the Create above to do the same thing)

@ghost ghost added the size/M label Sep 19, 2018
@steve-hawkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @tombuildsstuff and @katbyte , I'm having some trouble with the conditional logic on ClusterCodeVersion in the resourceArmServiceFabricClusterRead function. I have all the current acceptance tests working with the following:-

upgradeMode := string(props.UpgradeMode)
d.Set("upgrade_mode", upgradeMode)

if upgradeMode == "Manual" {
  d.Set("cluster_code_version", props.ClusterCodeVersion)
}

This however will fail if UpgradeMode is Manual and no version is specified:-

$ make fmt; make testacc TEST=./azurerm TESTARGS=-test.run=TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest
gofmt -w $(find . -name '*.go' |grep -v vendor)
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./azurerm -v -test.run=TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest
--- FAIL: TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest (53.41s)
    testing.go:513: Step 0 error: After applying this step, the plan was not empty:

        DIFF:

        UPDATE: azurerm_service_fabric_cluster.test
          cluster_code_version: "6.3.176.9494" => ""

        STATE:

        azurerm_resource_group.test:
          ID = /subscriptions/[REDACTED]/resourceGroups/acctestRG-8531727941990102137
          provider = provider.azurerm
          location = uksouth
          name = acctestRG-8531727941990102137
          tags.% = 0
        azurerm_service_fabric_cluster.test:
          ID = /subscriptions/[REDACTED]/resourcegroups/acctestRG-8531727941990102137/providers/Microsoft.ServiceFabric/clusters/acctest-8531727941990102137
          provider = provider.azurerm
          add_on_features.# = 0
          certificate.# = 0
          client_certificate_thumbprint.# = 0
          cluster_code_version = 6.3.176.9494
          cluster_endpoint = https://uksouth.servicefabric.azure.com/runtime/clusters/64d87576-e429-4e0e-ac9e-db8b20b4f546
          diagnostics_config.# = 0
          fabric_settings.# = 0
          location = uksouth
          management_endpoint = http://example:80
          name = acctest-8531727941990102137
          node_type.# = 1
          node_type.0.application_ports.# = 1
          node_type.0.application_ports.0.end_port = 30000
          node_type.0.application_ports.0.start_port = 20000
          node_type.0.client_endpoint_port = 2020
          node_type.0.durability_level = Bronze
          node_type.0.ephemeral_ports.# = 1
          node_type.0.ephemeral_ports.0.end_port = 65534
          node_type.0.ephemeral_ports.0.start_port = 49152
          node_type.0.http_endpoint_port = 80
          node_type.0.instance_count = 3
          node_type.0.is_primary = true
          node_type.0.name = first
          reliability_level = Bronze
          resource_group_name = acctestRG-8531727941990102137
          tags.% = 0
          upgrade_mode = Manual
          vm_image = Windows

          Dependencies:
            azurerm_resource_group.test
FAIL
FAIL    github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm       54.873s
make: *** [testacc] Error 1

I could make it so the cluster_code_version has to be specified if the upgrade_mode is set to Manual, would that be acceptable?

I might need some help if we want this to work with upgrade_mode to Manual and no cluster_code_version specified

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Sep 21, 2018

@steve-hawkins,

Might i suggest always reading in cluster_code_version:

  d.Set("cluster_code_version", v) //d.Set will handle nil values

and then adding computed to the cluster_code_version property so terraform expects it to be read in

```
$ acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMServiceFabricCluster_manualLatest (96.07s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm	97.192s
```
Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @steve-hawkins

This however will fail if UpgradeMode is Manual and no version is specified:-

So in order to fix this we can make the field Computed, which means if a value isn't specified then it'll use the default value from the API. Since this PR otherwise LGTM I'm going to push a commit to fix this and get this merged as a part of v1.16 (I hope you don't mind!)

Thanks!


if upgradeMode == "Manual" {
d.Set("cluster_code_version", props.ClusterCodeVersion)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can remove the upgradeMode == "Manual" check here - and ensure this value is always set (since this information is always useful) - instead we can make this field Computed in the schema (above), which will allow this value to be optional & have whatever default value is specified by the Azure API

@ghost ghost added the size/M label Sep 24, 2018
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff changed the title manual upgrade cluster code version azurerm_service_fabric_cluster - support for specifying the cluster code version Sep 24, 2018
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff dismissed katbyte’s stale review September 24, 2018 01:59

changes have been pushed

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Member

Tests pass:

screenshot 2018-09-24 at 11 58 59

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff merged commit f276997 into hashicorp:master Sep 24, 2018
tombuildsstuff added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
@steve-hawkins steve-hawkins deleted the feature/cluster_code_version branch September 24, 2018 09:59
@steve-hawkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @katbyte @tombuildsstuff I knew I would have been missing something obvious

Much appreciated and looking forward to contributing more

@steve-hawkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tombuildsstuff any chance this could make it into 1.16.0?

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff added this to the 1.16.0 milestone Sep 27, 2018
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Member

@steve-hawkins it's been merged so it'll go out as a part of that release - we're looking to ship v1.16 once #1987 has been merged :)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 6, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

azurerm_service_fabric_cluster upgrade_mode manual should be able to specify cluster_code_version
3 participants