-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_role_assignment
: Allow for sub aliases scopes
#20895
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @favoretti, thanks for looking at this. I think overall this looks good, I'm just concerned about unit test coverage (see comment below).
@manicminer Good catch on testing |
@favoretti Towards the end of the |
375e15b
to
a209916
Compare
@manicminer gotcha, pushed a fix. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 💡
This functionality has been released in v3.49.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you! |
Hi, I have a customer that has issues with this version though But when using the version 3.49.0 everything works out fine. Hidden ID: To Prevent personal information |
It seems that I am experiencing a similar error as mentioned above, but only with manually created subscriptions. I have several subscriptions that were created programmatically with Terraform, where I am able to upgrade the azurerm provider without any issues. It looks like the alias is not reading or accepting by the terraform which was created outside the terraform. |
So initial release code in 3.49 worked? Any ideas which release broke it? |
It works without any issues with 3.49.0, breaks with all versions above it |
Oh, glad i'm not the only @sampathkovuri Please @favoretti , can you look into this |
It still doesn't work. Same issues as above with version: "3.82.0" |
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
No description provided.