Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug:] azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system - correct validation for storage_capacity_in_tb minimum per sku_name and remove hardcoded maximum storage_capacity_in_tb #23428

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

WodansSon
Copy link
Collaborator

(fixes #23406)

@WodansSon WodansSon changed the title azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system - correct validation for storage_capacity_in_tb minimum per sku_name and remove validation check for maximum storage_capacity_in_tb [Bug:] azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system - correct validation for storage_capacity_in_tb minimum per sku_name and remove validation check for maximum storage_capacity_in_tb Sep 30, 2023
@WodansSon WodansSon added the bug label Sep 30, 2023
@WodansSon WodansSon changed the title [Bug:] azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system - correct validation for storage_capacity_in_tb minimum per sku_name and remove validation check for maximum storage_capacity_in_tb [Bug:] azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system - correct validation for storage_capacity_in_tb minimum per sku_name and remove hardcoded maximum storage_capacity_in_tb Sep 30, 2023
@WodansSon WodansSon added this to the v3.76.0 milestone Sep 30, 2023
@WodansSon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

image

@garvct
Copy link

garvct commented Oct 2, 2023

Is this bug fix scheduled to be released in v3.76.0 (~Oct 5, 2023)?

@WodansSon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@garvct, I don't believe there is going to be a provider release this week, but it should be in next weeks which will be v3.76.0(~Oct 12, 2023).

Copy link
Member

@manicminer manicminer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @WodansSon, I've taken a look and this mostly looks good. I've made a few requests inline below, if you can look at these then this should be good to merge.

@@ -50,12 +50,45 @@ type MaintenanceWindow struct {
TimeOfDayInUTC string `tfschema:"time_of_day_in_utc"`
}

type SkuProperties struct {
Name string
MinumumStorage int
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
MinumumStorage int
MinimumStorage int

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Comment on lines 238 to 243
if configCapacity.(int) < skuProperties.MinumumStorage {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field cannot be less than '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinumumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
}

if configCapacity.(int)%skuProperties.MinumumStorage != 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field must be defined in increments of '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinumumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if configCapacity.(int) < skuProperties.MinumumStorage {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field cannot be less than '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinumumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
}
if configCapacity.(int)%skuProperties.MinumumStorage != 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field must be defined in increments of '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinumumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
if configCapacity.(int) < skuProperties.MinimumStorage {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field cannot be less than '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinimumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
}
if configCapacity.(int)%skuProperties.MinimumStorage != 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field must be defined in increments of '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinimumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

}

func PossibleValuesForSkuName() []string {
var skus []string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should avoid (potentially) nil slices

Suggested change
var skus []string
skus := make([]string, 0)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Comment on lines 85 to 88
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-40", 48},
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-125", 16},
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-250", 8},
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-500", 4},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also try to avoid unkeyed structs

Suggested change
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-40", 48},
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-125", 16},
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-250", 8},
{"AMLFS-Durable-Premium-500", 4},
{
Name: "AMLFS-Durable-Premium-40",
MinimumStorage: 48,
},
{
Name: "AMLFS-Durable-Premium-125",
MinimumStorage: 16,
},
{
Name: "AMLFS-Durable-Premium-250",
MinimumStorage: 8,
},
{
Name: "AMLFS-Durable-Premium-500",
MinimumStorage: 4,
},

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

var _ sdk.ResourceWithCustomizeDiff = ManagedLustreFileSystemResource{}

func GetSkuPropertiesByName(skuName string) interface{} {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we please use a proper type here? We should be returning a *SkuProperties here

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Comment on lines 233 to 234
_, configSku := metadata.ResourceDiff.GetChange("sku_name")
_, configCapacity := metadata.ResourceDiff.GetChange("storage_capacity_in_tb")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can just use metadata.ResourceDiff.Get() here as we're not interested in the old value

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@@ -62,7 +62,9 @@ The following arguments are supported:

* `sku_name` - (Required) The SKU name for the Azure Managed Lustre File System. Possible values are `AMLFS-Durable-Premium-40`, `AMLFS-Durable-Premium-125`, `AMLFS-Durable-Premium-250` and `AMLFS-Durable-Premium-500`. Changing this forces a new resource to be created.

* `storage_capacity_in_tb` - (Required) The size of the Azure Managed Lustre File System in TiB. Possible values are between 8 and 128 and must be divisible by 8. Changing this forces a new resource to be created.
* `storage_capacity_in_tb` - (Required) The size of the Azure Managed Lustre File System in TiB. The valid values for this field are dependant on which `sku_name` has been defined in the configuration file. Changing this forces a new resource to be created. For more information on the valid values for this field please see the [product documentation](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/azure-managed-lustre/create-file-system-resource-manager#file-system-type-and-size-options).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Statement ordering

Suggested change
* `storage_capacity_in_tb` - (Required) The size of the Azure Managed Lustre File System in TiB. The valid values for this field are dependant on which `sku_name` has been defined in the configuration file. Changing this forces a new resource to be created. For more information on the valid values for this field please see the [product documentation](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/azure-managed-lustre/create-file-system-resource-manager#file-system-type-and-size-options).
* `storage_capacity_in_tb` - (Required) The size of the Azure Managed Lustre File System in TiB. The valid values for this field are dependant on which `sku_name` has been defined in the configuration file. For more information on the valid values for this field please see the [product documentation](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/azure-managed-lustre/create-file-system-resource-manager#file-system-type-and-size-options). Changing this forces a new resource to be created.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

* `storage_capacity_in_tb` - (Required) The size of the Azure Managed Lustre File System in TiB. Possible values are between 8 and 128 and must be divisible by 8. Changing this forces a new resource to be created.
* `storage_capacity_in_tb` - (Required) The size of the Azure Managed Lustre File System in TiB. The valid values for this field are dependant on which `sku_name` has been defined in the configuration file. Changing this forces a new resource to be created. For more information on the valid values for this field please see the [product documentation](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/azure-managed-lustre/create-file-system-resource-manager#file-system-type-and-size-options).

-> **NOTE:** If you are interested in `storage_capacity_in_tb` values larger than what is listed as the maximum `storage_capacity_in_tb` in the product documentation for your organization, please open a Microsoft support ticket.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be including this in our documentation as this isn't related to the provider at all, users should be able to find this on official Azure documentation.

Suggested change
-> **NOTE:** If you are interested in `storage_capacity_in_tb` values larger than what is listed as the maximum `storage_capacity_in_tb` in the product documentation for your organization, please open a Microsoft support ticket.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

if configCapacity.(int) < skuProperties.MinumumStorage {
return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field cannot be less than '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinumumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
}
if configCapacity.(int) < skuProperties.MinimumStorage {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll need a nil check here to avoid a potential crash

return fmt.Errorf("'storage_capacity_in_tb' field must be defined in increments of '%d' for the %q sku, got '%d'", skuProperties.MinumumStorage, configSku, configCapacity)
}
}
if configCapacity.(int)%skuProperties.MinimumStorage != 0 {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also here

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@WodansSon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

image

Copy link
Member

@manicminer manicminer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @WodansSon, this LGTM 👍

@manicminer manicminer merged commit eef5bef into main Oct 12, 2023
23 of 24 checks passed
@manicminer manicminer deleted the b_amlfs_capacity branch October 12, 2023 09:20
manicminer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2023
dduportal added a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
<Actions>
<action
id="4a39167e811ac038e4a588362092472c27cfbe9e4929ae61d035f708a093a669">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from &#34;3.74.0&#34; to
&#34;3.75.0&#34; in file &#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.75.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.75.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_application_load_balancer`
([#22517](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22517))&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_resource_management_private_link`
([#23098](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23098))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: `firewall` migrated to `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#22863](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22863))&#xA;*
`azurerm_bot_service_azure_bot` - add support for the `icon_url`
property
([#23114](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23114))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cognitive_deployment` - `capacity` property is now updateable
([#23251](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23251))&#xA;*
`azurerm_container_group` - added support for
`key_vault_user_identity_id`
([#23332](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23332))&#xA;*
`azurerm_data_factory` - added support for the `publish_enabled`
property
([#2334](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/2334))&#xA;*
`azurerm_firewall_policy_rule_collection_group` - add support for the
`description` property
([#23354](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23354))&#xA;*
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - `network_profile.network_policy` can be
migrated to `cilium`
([#23342](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23342))&#xA;*
`azurerm_log_analytics_workspace` - add support for the
`data_collection_rule_id` property
([#23347](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23347))&#xA;*
`azurerm_mysql_flexible_server` - add support for the
`io_scaling_enabled` property
([#23329](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23329))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_api_management_api` - fix importing `openapi`
format content file issue
([#23348](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23348))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cdn_frontdoor_rule` - allow a `cache_duration` of `00:00:00`
([#23384](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23384))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_cassandra_datacenter` - `sku_name` is now updatable
([#23419](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23419))&#xA;*
`azurerm_key_vault_certificate` - fix a bug that prevented soft-deleted
certificates from being recovered
([#23204](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23204))&#xA;*
`azurerm_log_analytics_solution` - fix create and update lifecycle of
resource by splitting methods
([#23333](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23333))&#xA;*
`azurerm_management_group_subscription_association` - mark resource as
gone correctly if not found when retrieving
([#23335](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23335))&#xA;*
`azurerm_management_lock` - add polling after create and delete to check
for RP propagation
([#23345](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23345))&#xA;*
`azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting` - added validation to ensure at
least one of `category` or `category_group` is supplied
([#23308](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23308))&#xA;*
`azurerm_palo_alto_local_rulestack_prefix_list` - fix rulestack not
being committed on delete
([#23362](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23362))&#xA;*
`azurerm_palo_alto_local_rulestack_fqdn_list` - fix rulestack not being
committed on delete
([#23362](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23362))&#xA;*
`security_center_subscription_pricing_resource` - disabled extensions
logic now works as expected
([#22997](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22997))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
            <details>
                <summary>3.76.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.76.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_security_center_storage_defender`
([#23242](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23242))&#xA;*
New Resource:
`azurerm_spring_cloud_application_insights_application_performance_monitoring`
([#23107](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23107))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
provider: updating to build using Go `1.21.3`
([#23514](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23514))&#xA;*
provider: the `roll_instances_when_required` provider feature in the
`virtual_machine_scale_set` block is now optional
([#22976](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22976))&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20231012.1141427` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#23534](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23534))&#xA;*
Data Source: `azurerm_application_gateway` - support for
`backend_http_settings`, `global`, `gateway_ip_configuration` and
additional attributes
([#23318](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23318))&#xA;*
Data Source: `azurerm_network_service_tags` - export the `name`
attribute
([#23382](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23382))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_postgresql_cluster` - add support for `sql_version` of
`16` and `citus_version` of `12.1`
([#23476](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23476))&#xA;*
`azurerm_palo_alto_local_rulestack` - correctly normalize the `location`
property
([#23483](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23483))&#xA;*
`azurerm_static_site` - add support for `app_settings`
([#23421](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23421))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_automation_schedule` - fix a bug when
updating `start_time`
([#23494](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23494))&#xA;*
`azurerm_eventhub` - remove ForceNew and check `partition_count` is not
decreased
([#23499](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23499))&#xA;*
`azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system` - update validation for
`storage_capacity_in_tb` according to `sku_name` in use
([#23428](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23428))&#xA;*
`azurerm_virtual_machine` - fix a crash when the API response for the
`os_profile` block contains nil properties
([#23535](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23535))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AMLFS provider limit for storage_capacity_in_tb set to 8 - 128TiB, when the value should be 8 - 768TiB.
4 participants