Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: azurerm_dev_center_catalog #24833

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

jiaweitao001
Copy link
Contributor

@jiaweitao001 jiaweitao001 commented Feb 9, 2024

  • Add support for new resource azurerm_dev_center_catalog.

  • All tests are passing.

--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterCatalogs_basic (455.75s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterCatalogs_adoGit (504.90s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterCatalogs_update (537.58s)
PASS


* `path` - (Required) The folder where the catalog items can be found inside the repository.

* `secret_identifier` - (Required) A reference to the Key Vault secret containing a security token to authenticate to a Git repository.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if this is a key vault key should it be

Suggested change
* `secret_identifier` - (Required) A reference to the Key Vault secret containing a security token to authenticate to a Git repository.
* `key_vault_key_url|id` - (Required) A reference to the Key Vault secret containing a security token to authenticate to a Git repository.

Comment on lines 68 to 69
"gitHub",
"adoGit",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the design of this resource these want to be two blocks which conflict with each other, one for github and one for azure_devops_git - or two entirely separate resources - rather than trying to top-level these fields, can we update this to use two blocks instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Split to 2 separate blocks as requested.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🪴

@katbyte katbyte merged commit f5203d4 into hashicorp:main Feb 20, 2024
34 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.93.0 milestone Feb 20, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
rizkybiz pushed a commit to rizkybiz/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
* New Resource: azurerm_dev_center_catalog

* fix timeout

* fix naming

* split github/adogit blocks

* remove nil check
rizkybiz pushed a commit to rizkybiz/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
lemeurherve pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.92.0&#34; to &#34;3.93.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.93.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.93.0&#xA;*
**New Data Source**: `azurerm_express_route_circuit_peering`
([#24971](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24971))&#xA;*
**New Data Source**: `azurerm_storage_table_entities`
([#24973](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24973))&#xA;*
**New Resource**: `azurerm_dev_center_catalog`
([#24833](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24833))&#xA;*
**New Resource**: `azurerm_system_center_virtual_machine_manager_server`
([#24278](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24278))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_key_vault` - conditionally polling the Data
Plane endpoint when `public_network_access_enabled` is set to false
([#23823](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23823))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_account` - allow the `identity.type` property to be
`SystemAssigned, UserAssigned` when using a Customer Managed Key
([#24923](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24923))&#xA;*
`azurerm_automation_account` - prevent the `identity.identity_ids` User
Assigned identity being set when not specified in config
([#24977](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24977))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240221.1170458` of
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24967](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24967))&#xA;*
dependencies: refactor `azurerm_spring_cloud_configuration_service` to
use `go-azure-sdk`
([#24918](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24918))&#xA;*
provider: support or the feature flag
`virtual_machine_scale_set.reimage_on_manual_upgrade`
([#22975](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22975))&#xA;*
`sentinel`: updating to use the transport layer from
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest`
([#24962](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24962))&#xA;*
`sqlvirtualmachines`: updating to use the transport layer from
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest`
([#24912](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24912))&#xA;*
`nginx` : updating to use `2024-01-01-preview`
([#24868](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24868))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - support for the `backup.tier` property
([#24595](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24595))&#xA;*
`azurerm_linux_virtual_machine` - the `virtual_machine_scale_set_id`
proeprty can now be changed without creating a new resource
([#24768](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24768))&#xA;*
`azurerm_machine_learning_workspace` - support for the
`managed_network.isolation_mode` property
([#24951](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24951))&#xA;*
`azurerm_private_dns_resolver_inbound_endpoint` - support the `static`
value for the `private_ip_allocation_method` property
([#24952](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24952))&#xA;*
`azurerm_postgresql_flexible_server` - expose the `storage_tier` field
([#24892](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24892))&#xA;*
`azurerm_redis_cache` - support for the
`preferred_data_persistence_auth_method` property
([#24370](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24370))&#xA;*
`azurerm_servicebus_namespace` - support for the
`premium_messaging_partitions` property
([#24676](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24676))&#xA;*
`azurerm_windows_virtual_machine` - the `virtual_machine_scale_set_id`
proeprty can now be changed without creating a new resource
([#24768](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24768))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_cognitive_deployment` - the
`version_upgrade_option` property can not be updated without creating a
new resource
([#24922](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24922))&#xA;*
`azurerm_data_protection_backup_vault` - support or the `soft_delete`
and `retention_duration_in_days` properties
([#24775](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24775))&#xA;*
`azurerm_data_factory_pipeline` - correctly handle incorrect header
values
([#24921](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24921))&#xA;*
`azurerm_kusto_cluster` - `optimized_auto_scale` is now updated after
`sku` has been updated
([#24906](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24906))&#xA;*
`azurerm_key_vault_certificate` - will now only update the
`lifetime_action` of the certificate block unless otherwise required
([#24755](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24755))&#xA;*
`azurerm_linux_virtual_machine_scale_set` - correctly include
`public_ip_prefix_id` during updates
([#24939](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24939))&#xA;*
`azurerm_postgresql_flexible_server` - the
`customer_managed_key.key_vault_key_id` property is now required
([#24981](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24981))&#xA;*
`azurerm_nginx_deployment` - changing the `sku` property now creates a
new resource
([#24905](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24905))&#xA;*
`azurerm_orchestrated_virtual_machine_scale_set` - the `disk_size_gb`
and `lun` parameters of `data_disks` are optional now
([#24944](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24944))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_account` - change order of API calls to be GET-then-PUT
ratehr then PATCHES
([#23935](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23935))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_account` - improve the validation around the
`immutability_policy` being used with `blob_properties`
([#24938](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24938))&#xA;*
`azurerm_security_center_setting` - prevent a bug when name is
`SENTINEL`
([#24497](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24497))&#xA;*
`azurerm_windows_virtual_machine_scale_set` - correctly include
`public_ip_prefix_id` during updates
([#24939](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24939))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/19/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
rizkybiz pushed a commit to rizkybiz/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
* New Resource: azurerm_dev_center_catalog

* fix timeout

* fix naming

* split github/adogit blocks

* remove nil check
rizkybiz pushed a commit to rizkybiz/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants